You can watch video from a TV station in Texas to see a report on Border Patrol and local law enforcement being shot at by “our freinds” in Mexico.

Watch here as long as the link is good. KRGV- TV

Surely another amnesty will stop this. Right?

For those who haven’t spent a lot of time investigating the illegal ailien/open borders lobby, here is a good primer.

While we are sure that the mainstream media [MSM] including the AJC have simply been beaten to this little gem by World Net Daily and that you will no doubt read in Cynthia Tucker’s next column about the Mexica Movement, we want to bring it to your attention now.

Hispanic group boycotts
Disney ‘white supremacists’
Mexica Movement: ‘We are radical.
More radical than you can imagine’
2006 WorldNetDaily.com
Posted: July 15, 2006

A radical Hispanic group is promoting a boycott of the Walt Disney Company because, contends the Mexica Movement, the entertainment giant “has made a habit of hiring talk show hosts who spread the Minutemen white supremacist racist agenda.”

The boycott announcement specifically cites radio legend and Presidential Medal of Freedom winner Paul Harvey, as well as popular talker Doug McIntyre. Both Harvey and McIntyre are nationally syndicated by ABC, which is owned by Disney.

On its website, the Mexica Movement calls for “an immediate international boycott against The Walt Disney Company and all of its holdings. We are asking for this boycott because Disney has made a habit of hiring talk show hosts who spread the Minutemen white supremacist racist agenda against the Mexican and Central American communities in the United States.”

The organization will continue calling for the Disney boycott, it says, “until we are assured of the immediate firing of all of Disney’s ABC racist radio terrorists who are spreading racist hate against the Mexican and Central American community by inciting threats of violence against us.”

You need to read the entire report yourself …and don’t miss the photos!

Listen to leaders of illegal alien lobby here.

Activists, legislators and many people in the media from around the nation have been contacting us with questions about The Georgia Security and Immigration Compliance Act, authored by Georgia state Senator Chip Rogers and signed into law April 17, 2006.

To make it easier to access information on the Georgia law [SB 529], we happily offer an outline of the law, written by Senator Rogers. I have added hyperlinks to educate the reader.

The text of the law can be read here.

Section 1 of the bill establishes that the Georgia Security and Immigration Compliance Act shall be construed to conform to federal immigration law.

Section 2 ( Basic Pilot Program – now called E-VERIFY –) [ALSO SEE HERE] provides that on or after July 1, 2007, all public employers and those working on public contracts must begin to register and participate in the federal work authorization program. This program is operated by the Department of Homeland Security and verifies the legal status of a person to be employed in the United States.

Section 3 states that any person convicted of trafficking a person for labor or sexual servitude shall be found guilty of a felony and required to serve a prison sentence of at least one and no more than 20 years. Any person convicted of the same offense, however the victim is a minor, shall serve a prison sentence of at least 10 and no more than 20 years.

Section 4 (287 (g) Program) provides that the Georgia Commissioner of Public Safety must establish a “memorandum of understanding” between the state , U.S. Dept. of Justice or Homeland Security concerning the enforcement of immigration laws. Certain police officers shall be trained in accordance with the “memorandum of understanding” and shall be authorized to enforce federal immigration and custom laws.

Section 5 (Law Enforcement Support Center) provides that an officer must make a reasonable effort to determine the nationality of any person charged and arrested for a felony or DUI. If the prisoner is a foreign national, the officer must verify their ” lawful [immigration] status “> either through documents in possession of the prisoner or a query to the Law Enforcement Support Center. If it is found that the prisoner is not lawfully present in the U.S., the arresting officer or officer in charge shall notify the U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security.

Section 6 establishes the “Registration of Immigration Assistance Act.” This Act specifies exactly what actions a person who is not an attorney can take in assisting illegal immigrants with gaining legal status. Apparently, people are claiming that they can assist illegal immigrants in becoming legal citizens and charging people fees for legal assistance and advice, however they have no authority to give such assistance or advice. Any person convicted of violating this section may be fined up to $1,000.00 per violation.

Section 7 provides that after January 1, 2008 no compensation over $600.00 per year for labor services to a person who has not been verified to legally work in the U.S. can be claimed as a deductible business expense for state income taxes, regardless if the individual is issued a IRS 1099 Form. The Georgia Commissioner of Revenue is authorized to create forms to be used in order to verify the legal status of an employee.

Section 8 (ITIN) states that a withholding agent is required to withhold 6% state income tax of an individual using an Individual Taxpayer Identification Number whose wages are reported on a 1099 Form.

Section 9 (SAVE Program) states that any applicant
for federaL or state and local public benefits, who is 18 years or older, must execute an affidavit that he or she is a citizen or lawfully present in the U.S. For any applicant that has indicated that they are an alien lawfully present in the U.S., the agency must verify that person’s status through the Systematic Alien Verification of Entitlement Federal program. Any person who knowingly provides false information on this affidavit shall be guilty of a felony and upon conviction, pay a fine of no more than $1,000.00 or be sentenced to imprisonment of no more than one year. Exceptions for this verification process include: federal exceptions such as emergency care, assistance for immunizations with respect to immunizable and communicable diseases, soup kitchens, and pre-natal care.

Below is a column written by D.A. King published [ ‘Flow freely’ will erase face of U. S.] in today’s AJC [And here]. The column was written in response to “A Mexico-U.S.-Canada highway? Roll it out” June 23, 2006 AJC by Robert Cady [ here from a different publication]

We thank the AJC for the space.
[Added here 13 October 2006, Robert Pastor’s testimony to the U.S. Senate June, 2005]

Added here 8 May 2006…. A financial expert comments on the AMERO ( 3 minute video – click here)

Added 17 July 2007 – short video from CNN Lou Dobbs regarding the “integration” of the three countries of North America…the free flow of goods, services and people. HERE.
[POTUS]

I have added some links into the original text to educate the reader.

‘Flow freely’ will erase face of U. S.

Those who study our national illegal immigration crisis watch with knowing sadness as millions of Americans outraged over our porous borders eventually get to the obvious question: Why has the president of the United States refused to secure American borders?

Perhaps it is part of a larger plan.

Without a vote in Congress, or consent of the American people, our intentionally unsecured borders and our government’s deliberate lack of enforcement of our immigration and employment laws could be an essential step to a much larger goal: a “North American Union.”

While virtually ignored in the mainstream media, the leaders of the nations of North America last year announced a plan to combine the infrastructure, security and ultimately the economies of the three nations. The linchpin of the “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America” is the “free flow” of goods, services … and people.

The un-stated NAFTA-World Trade Organization-based theory is simple: Borders are geopolitical abstractions — barriers to increased profit — and have become obsolete in the global economy. At present, labor is overpriced in the United States. The middle-class American Dream, while charming, is outdated.

If you like the idea of illegal, taxpayer-subsidized labor from Mexico, you will love the concept involved here: an unending flow of unskilled low-wage workers looking for a better life with no cumbersome immigration laws about which to be concerned.

Including the already signed 2004 “Totalization” agreement, yet to be considered by Congress — combining the Social Security systems of Mexico and the United States — the Bush administration seems to be following the recommendations of a little noted 2005 publication titled “Building a North American Community,” released by the Council on Foreign Relations, a multinational independent foreign-policy organization.

The CFR report further recommends creation of “permanent tribunals” that could overrule American courts on matters of “unfair trade practices” and “tri-national competition” disputes.

Few could doubt that once put into place, the laws and regulations creating the corporate friendly borderless continent would be enthusiastically enforced.

Supporters of the dissolution of the Founding Fathers sovereign republic have already played the “jingoist” card in an attempt to pre-marginalize those who would dare to object to a multilingual, continental Super State dedicated to low wages and increased markets in which “trade, capital and people flow freely.”

Americans with the temerity to speak up in objection to Mexican customs inspection offices in Kansas City, the “Amero” replacing the dollar and a North American Union by 2010 should prepare for a battery of invectives containing “phobes,” “ists” and “isims.”

The more politically correct may want to practice repeating, ” I pledge allegiance to the Continent and to the Commerce for which it stands.”

Suggestions for a possible new flag, anyone?

Letters to AJC editor go to letters@ajc.com about 80-100 words with name address and phone number.
Contact D.A. – DA@TheDustinInmanSociety.org

We are very relieved that many others are now recognizing the existence – and the danger to our nation and our way of life it represents – of the Security and Prosperity Partnership [SPP].

We recommend that you read and understand the Council on Foreign Relations report from last March.

The fact that President Bush is plotting to erase our borders is finally getting the attention that it warrants. Next, maybe even the mainstream media will acknowledge the true goal of our intentionally un-secured borders and un-enforced laws.

We point to D.A. King’s 2005 warnings on Bush’s on-going effort to create a borderless continent with the free flow of goods and people here in this blog as well as here, here and [ now updated with current articles] here.

As the CFR the U.S. Senate and the president have made clear, their intention is to eliminate illegal immigration by eliminating our borders.

No gracias.

We thank VDARE.com and Juan Mann for answers to frequently asked questions about “justice” and illegal aliens.

From VDARE.com:

Thanks to the efforts of immigrationist advocacy groups, the immigrationist press, and immigrationist politicians, it’s difficult to get a straight answer on what the law is. We’ve seen Bush administration officials claim that Section 245(i) was not an amnesty for illegals. (It was.) Police officers claiming that “Illegal immigration is not a crime. It is. The English language is twisted in outrageous ways to serve the cause of immigration, as when President Bush called illegals “hardworking citizens who are willing to walk 400 miles of desert in blistering heat to find work.” They’re not citizens. This FAQ will provide our readers with ammunition if they are writing about or debating the immigration crisis in America.]

What is an alien?
What’s the difference between legal and illegal aliens?
What’s a green card?
What’s an LPR?
Can legal or illegal aliens be deported?
How can someone REPORT ILLEGAL ALIENS or criminal alien residents to the federal government?
En Espanol — Cómo denunciar ilegales
What’s the difference between an immigrant and a non-immigrant?
Would a U.S. citizen ID card help fight illegal immigration?
What is amnesty?
Who were the beneficiaries of the 1986 amnesty?
The federal government has stopped giving amnesty to illegal aliens, right?
How does the federal government deport aliens?
How can the EOIR be abolished?
How can the BIA be abolished?
What do the immigration judges do?
How do aliens avoid being deported in Immigration Court?
Who else could do all the work if the EOIR and the Immigration Court system is abolished?
What if someone gets deported that wasn’t supposed to be deported?
What is an immigration bond?
Why is detention, detention, detention so important?
Where can I learn more about the immigration process?

Click here for the answers and entire article

Apparently, every rainbow has a silver lining. The effects of Chip Rogers’ Georgia Security and Immigration Compliance Act [ SB 529]are starting to be seen more than a year before the law begins to go into effect!

Mortgage lenders who have been allowed to make loans to illegal aliens – encouraging an illegal to remain in the U.S is a federal crime– along with their equally guilty partners, real estate agents operating the same racket, are now complaining that illegal aliens don’t seem too excited about moving to, remaining in or buying a house in Georgia.

The news of Senator Rogers’ intended consequence has reached California and is reported by the Los Angeles Times. [Our pal Terry Anderson refers to that AJC of the left coast as “LATIMES“]

Georgia Law Chills Latino Home-Buying Market

By Jenny Jarvie, [LA] Times Staff Writer
June 19, 2006

ATLANTA — Two months ago, all Alina Arguello had to do to find Latino home buyers was put up a sign and answer her phone.

But ever since Georgia passed one of the most stringent and far-reaching immigration laws in the nation, the number of Latino buyers who call the Re/Max agent’s home office in suburban Atlanta has dwindled from about 10 to two a day.

“We’re seeing a drastic drop,” she said. “There’s just a tremendous amount of people who want homes, but are not calling.” Many real estate agents and mortgage providers who cater to Spanish-speaking immigrants across Georgia say that the flourishing Latino home buying market has faltered since April, when Gov. Sonny Perdue signed the Georgia Security and Immigration Compliance Act.

Almost immediately, Latino home buyers pulled out of contracts. Some who had already bought, put their homes on the market. And many prospective buyers stopped searching for homes.

Although Georgia’s new legislation does not prohibit illegal immigrants from owning property, many wonder whether they will want to live in Georgia when it begins to come into effect in July 2007.

The law will require companies with state contracts to verify employees’ immigration status, penalize employers who knowingly hire illegal immigrants, curtail many government benefits to illegal immigrants and require that jailers check the immigration status of anyone who is charged with a felony or driving under the influence.

As is the habit of writers and papers with an agenda [the AJC pops into my head again] LATIMES describes the effect on “Latinos” instead of people who are in our country illegally [ a federal crime].

SB 529 is not aimed at Latinos or any other ethnic group. It is aimed at illegal employers and aliens.

The report does get around to mentioning the illegals though:

Diego Castaneda, a real estate agent and loan officer in Norcross, Ga., had two clients — illegal immigrants from Mexico — who were a week away from closing on homes in Atlanta’s northern suburbs when they pulled out of their contracts.

We like Senator Rogers’ quote from the “LATIMES” article:

State Sen. Chip Rogers, a Republican who represents some of Atlanta’s northern suburbs and who sponsored the legislation, said he was “very satisfied” that the law seemed to be prompting some illegal immigrants to consider leaving Georgia.

That illegals are hesitant to come or remain here, that employers are now worrying about legal status of new hires and that profiteering mortgage lenders are whining proves that enforcement, – even the promise of future enforcement – works.

Thank you Senator Rogers!

For any Bush-Bot who may still maintain that the President is trying to stop illegal immigration and punish employers….please read this from the Washington Post!

Employer sanctions for illegal workers scaled back

By Spencer S. Hsu and Kari Lydersen
Washington Post

WASHINGTON – The Bush administration, which is vowing to crack down on U.S. companies that hire illegal workers, virtually abandoned such employer sanctions before it began pushing to overhaul U.S. immigration laws last year, government statistics show.

Between 1999 and 2003, worksite enforcement operations were scaled back 95 percent by the Immigration and Naturalization Service, which subsequently was merged into the Homeland Security Department. The number of employers prosecuted for unlawfully employing immigrants dropped from 182 to four, and fines collected declined from $3.6 million to $212,000, according to federal statistics.

In 1999, the United States initiated fines against 417 companies. In 2004, it issued fine notices to three.

The government’s steady retreat from workplace enforcement in the 20 years since it became illegal to hire undocumented workers is the result of fierce political pressure from business lobbies, immigrant rights groups and members of Congress, according to law enforcement veterans. Punishing employers also was de-emphasized as the government recognized that it lacks the tools to do the job well, and as the Department of Homeland Security shifted resources to combat terrorism…

Rest of article here.

You can read Zamarripa’s analysis here. It is from his Website, GALEO, faithfully tended by Jerry Gonzales.

Click here then go to “photo gallery” to see Jerry in action. [English tab on right.]

We won’t post the entire analysis, but we take great pleasure in this part of it:

Valid Identification and Employment Authorization Documents

Effective January 1, 2008, Section 7 provides that an employer cannot take a state tax deduction for payments of $600 or more made to any person who does not have valid identification as identified in the Employment Eligibility Verification Form I-9 of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Additionally, Matricula Consular Cards shall not constitute valid identification.

From the mouths of illegals: we are not going home and you can’t make us! [If you try…we will call you a racist.]

This from the Houston Chronicle:

Immigrants say temporary worker program won’t be temporary

SAN BENITO — Jose Luis Vazquez and Elia Garcia know what they’re talking about when they predict that new immigrants crossing the border under the U.S. Senate’s temporary guest worker program won’t go home.

They each came over illegally more than a decade ago. They have children, jobs and houses — a life that would be difficult to dismantle because of a date on the calendar.

While the immigration plan would allow Vazquez and Garcia to stay — after paying fines and back taxes, and learning English — newcomers would compete for one of 200,000 temporary guest worker visas that would be issued each year.

President Bush called for such a plan last month on the theory that these immigrants would earn enough money to help their families and then move home.

The guest worker idea has strong appeal among such industries as construction, where nearly a third of the work force are immigrants.

“It’s a win-win,” said Jerry Howard, chief executive of the National Association of Home Builders. “This guest worker program would allow immigrants to come in who are employed and skilled laborers and get them into the system while meeting demands for labor.”

But some immigration experts say temporary worker programs have never worked in free market societies, because as workers become used to higher wages and start to assimilate, they don’t want to go back. It’s even harder to return once children are born here, making them automatic Americans, and the Senate bill allows for spouses of workers also to obtain visas.

“I think the general conclusion of everybody who has studied guest or temporary worker programs is that they are never as advertised,” said Michael Teitelbaum, a demographer with the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in New York. “They are never temporary programs, nor are the workers temporary.”

Fewer than half the “Bracero” workers brought in to work the farms in World War I, World War II, and the Korean War went home, said Vernon Briggs, a labor economist at Cornell University

The Bush amnesty that is not an amnesty isn’t a “guest worker plan” either…it is open borders. Open borders is no borders…no borders is no nation.
Read the rest of the article here.