July 6, 2010

THANK YOU BARAK OBAMA! We partially agree with Jacoby: Obama likely just killed amnesty in his presidency

Posted by D.A. King at 10:00 pm - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

Dallas Morning News OPINION

Tamar Jacoby: Feds should stay out of Arizona’s fight

June 22, 2010

The Obama administration is considering suing Arizona to block implementation of its harsh new immigration enforcement measure, SB 1070. The Justice Department doesn’t have much time – barring a judicial stay, the law goes into effect July 29 – and a decision, to sue or not to sue, is expected any day.

SB 1070 is an abomination, no doubt about it, and the White House is under intense pressure to act. But a Justice Department lawsuit would be a horrendous mistake – one that could end all hope of passing comprehensive immigration reform as long as Barack Obama is president.

In a radical departure from settled law, the legislation makes illegal immigration a state crime in Arizona – until now, it has been a federal matter. Even more controversially, the measure authorizes and in some cases requires local police to probe the immigration status of people they have stopped for other legal reasons, including violations of municipal ordinances. All of that is bad enough, but the most devastating effect of SB 1070 may be political – the way it is poisoning the American immigration debate.

President Barack Obama, President Felipe Calderon of Mexico, the Roman Catholic Church, the AFL-CIO and a Who’s Who of Latino pop stars have denounced the legislation. Dozens of conferences and conventions scheduled to take place in Arizona have been canceled. And tens of thousands of people across the country have participated in demonstrations pillorying the measure as a racially motivated assault on immigrants and an invitation to ethnic profiling.

Meanwhile, on the other side of the divide, polls show that 60 percent of Americans support SB 1070. The polling hasn’t probed deeply, so it’s hard to say exactly why they endorse the law. Some supporters talk about stemming border violence and controlling crime – particularly the mob-style crimes committed by international smuggling cartels. Others, judging by talk radio and blog chatter, seem more bothered by the simple illegality of illegal immigration.

Few surveys, now or in the past, show voters to be particularly angry at unlawful immigrants or eager to punish them. But many are very angry at the dysfunctional immigration system – and at a political class that doesn’t seem bothered by millions of people making a mockery of the law.

For weeks, proponents and opponents have played off one another, passion fueling passion, charges sparking countercharges and rage, to the point that there’s almost no point in talking anymore – people on both sides are that entrenched.

Where one side sees law enforcement and personal security, the other sees racism. The very term “enforcement” has become a dirty word to many immigrants-rights activists.

And to the nearly two-thirds of Americans who back the measure, reform advocates look increasingly suspect – unwilling to admit an obvious truth (that illegal immigrants have broken the law) and far too ready to play the race card against those with legitimate concerns.

For both sides, immigration is becoming an issue of good versus evil. And in that kind of moralistic standoff, there is no middle ground – no room for politics or compromise.

It’s a disastrous course – and one all too familiar in American politics. How long before the immigration debate is as stalemated as the standoff on abortion? Each side sees the other as morally reprehensible. Each is sure it’s right. We as a nation can’t resolve the problem, but we can’t let go of it, either – and it soon poisons other issues, making it hard to do even basic things, like confirm judges.

An administration lawsuit against SB 1070 would only push immigration further in this direction. What’s needed is comprehensive immigration reform, a balanced, bipartisan bill supported by a broad national consensus. That’s what the administration should be focused on – developing consensus on immigration, not exacerbating a widening divide and closing off all possibility of compromise.

Tamar Jacoby is president of ImmigrationWorks USA, a national federation of small-business owners advocating immigration reform. Her e-mail address is tjacoby@immigrationworksusa.org

HERE