August, 2020 RNC Resolution Refuting the Disgraced Hate-Mongers at the SPLC

August 31, 2020August 30, 2020Hall County Business License office does not require verification of E-Verify use/authority when administering renewals Response to OPEN RECORDS REQUEST![]() Image: Hall Co. Georgia website. From Brandi Smith (Business License) August 27, 2020 12:14PM Mr. King, We only require an E-Verify number one time when any new application is made. During our renewal process, we only send out a bill to the business owner and they are not required to send their E-verify number again. I hope this helps. Have a Blessed Day! Brandi Smith From: Brittany Walker (Planning) Brandi, I believe he wants all correspondence in writing. Would you like to email him? Thank you, Brittany Walker https://www.hallcounty.org/FormCenter/Public-Information-57/Citizen-Comment-Card-133 From: D.A. King <> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. My sincere apologies. I cited the wrong law on business license renewals. I meant the E-Verify law. OCGA 36-60-6. Please let me know if you need a new request. Our communication will be via email (in writing). I am asking for copies of the documents required in OCGA 36-60-6 (E-Verify) for applicants to submit and issuing agencies to collect for all annual renewals of business licenses from original issue ( I assume that was 2017 from your first response) to and including 2020 or the last year Vital Foods business license was renewed. I copy the law below. Thank you, and agin, my apologies for my confusing typo. O.C.G.A. § 36-60-6 Copy Citation § 36-60-6. Utilization of federal work authorization program; “employee” defined; issuance of license; evidence of state licensure; annual reporting; standardized form affidavit; violation; investigations History Code 1981, § 36-60-6, enacted by Ga. L. 1992, p. 1553, § 1; Ga. L. 2011, p. 794, § 12/HB 87; Ga. L. 2013, p. 111, § 4/SB 160. I support the police. On Aug 27, 2020, at 11:18 AM, Brittany Walker (Planning) wrote: Good Morning, I spoke with Brandi from Business License regarding your request and she has some questions pertaining to your request. We are a little unclear about it. We want to get you what you need. She called and left you a message at 404-316-6712. If there is a better contact number please let me know. Thank you, Brittany Walker https://www.hallcounty.org/FormCenter/Public-Information-57/Citizen-Comment-Card-133 From: D.A. King CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To be clear. Again. I am making a second request for copies of the documents required under OCGA 50-36-1 for all annual renewal of business license since original issue. The original copies you sent are here and here. I support the police. On Aug 27, 2020, at 9:56 AM, Brittany Walker (Planning) wrote: Good Morning, Business License had sent everything in the previous Open Records Request that they have regarding this business license that was requested. The application was included (there is no application each year to be submitted), the Citizenship form was included on the owner/office of the business, the driverâs license copy was included and as for the E-Verify affidavit, they only require a number to be submitted to our office upon submitting the application and that number was on the application that was submitted in the open records request. I attached the Business License documents again to this email. Attached are the documents from Hall County Building Inspections. This case is now closed. Thank you, Brittany Walker https://www.hallcounty.org/FormCenter/Public-Information-57/Citizen-Comment-Card-133 From: D.A. King CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Ms. Walker, (pls forgive the italics, my keyboard has gone crazy. Sorry) As I did not word my original open records request clearly, please consider this a separate and additional open records request. I hope to see copies of the documents listed below from the first year Vital Foods LLC applied for and was issued a business license and the same docs from each year that license was renewed. I am assuming that 2017 was the first year of application, but if not, please send me the first yearâs documents listed below. Please send me copies of the business license application, E-Verify affidavit, verification of lawful presence affidavit and secure ID affidavit if applicable for original issue and for renewal of business license for Vital Foods. I mailed the check to pay for the research on my first request last week. Thank you, D.A. King I support the police. On Aug 21, 2020, at 4:11 PM, D.A. King wrote: I support the police. Begin forwarded message: From: “Brittany Walker (Planning)” Good Afternoon, Attached are the documents from Hall County. I have also attached an invoice with instructions for payment. This request is now closed. O.C.G.A. § 50-18-72(a)(20) Social security numbers, motherâs birth name, credit card, debit card, bank account, Thank you, Brittany Walker From: D.A. King CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Yes, pls proceed. I support the police. On Aug 19, 2020, at 10:37 AM, Brittany Walker (Planning) wrote: Good Morning, The approximate cost to complete your request from Hall County Business License is $21.96. I am estimating 1 hour at $21.96 per hour. These documents can be sent to you in an email. An invoice of the actual cost will be sent when the request is complete. It will take approximately 5 business days to get this information back to you assuming you would like to proceed. Please let me know how you would like to proceed. Thank you, Brittany Walker
August 25, 2020The Dustin Inman Society is proud to note the participation of friends in the 2020 GOP Convention and the pro-enforcement effort across America![]() Image DIS
Dustin Inman Society friends and board members are very visible in pro-enforcement movementÂ
Angel Mom Mary Ann Mendoza ![]() Photo Onenewsnow.com
Mary Ann Mendoza is a scheduled speaker at the Republican Convention tonight (Tuesday, August 25). Mary Ann is an Angel Mom and will be speaking on behalf of all American families that have lost loved ones to illegal immigration and honoring her son, Brandon, a police officer who was killed in 2014 by a drunk illegal alien. Mary Ann can be seen here giving a preview of tonightâs convention speech. We were extremely proud that Mary Ann traveled from her home in Arizona to be a featured speaker at the Dustin Inman Societyâs immigration forum in Atlanta, âHonoring Immigrants: An Expert, Pro-Enforcement Discussion on Immigrationâ in Atlanta, February 7, 2020. Former Acting ICE Director Tom Homan was our featured speaker. Atlanta media did not cover our event. Neither did the discredited SPLC. Mary Ann gave a heartbreaking account of her sonâs death and pointed out the national changes needed to save future deaths at the hands of illegal aliens and the fact that all illegal alien crime is preventable. Mary Ann has been a faithful friend and incredible help to Billy and Kathy Inman, Dustin Inman’s parents. Billy passed away in 2019. See “Who was Dustin Inman.” Angel Mom Sabine Durden-Coulter ![]() Photo: Twitter We also note that one of our board members, Sabine Durden-Coulter, was a speaker at the 2016 Republican Convention that nominated Donald Trump for President. Sabineâs son, Dominic, was a 30-year-old sheriff’s office dispatcher, hit and killed by an illegal alien driver in 2012. Dominic was on his his motorcycle. Sabine is also an Angel Mom and offered her opinion on illegal immigration and American families and the Democrat convention that took lace last week on Fox News. âThey want to flood our country with illegals and non-citizens and us Americans, who paid into the system, weâre supposed to pay for that. Thatâs wrong, it canât happen, and it wonât happen,â Durden-Coulter told âFox & Friends Firstâ last Friday. âThey are telling us that is more important to them and every American needs to wake up because what happened to myself and thousands of other Americans who suffered the same tragedy like myself they need to wake up,â Durden-Coulter said.  Georgia state Rep Vernon Jones ![]() Vernon Jones (L), D.A. King at a 2007 DIS Atlanta rally against immigration amnesty. We were overjoyed to see our old friend Georgia state Rep Vernon Jones give a rousing and moving speech at last nightâs (Monday) GOP gathering. Rep Jones has been a friend of DIS since 2007 when he attended one of our Atlanta rallies against a repeat of the failed 1986 âone-timeâ amnesty for illegal aliens and illegal employers. Rep Jones, a Democrat, was a leading co-sponsor of anti-sanctuary city legislation, HB1083, introduced in the Georgia General Assembly in the 2020 session. After a hard but successful fight against  the discredited and disgraced SPLC and the anti-borders GALEO, to see the bill pass out of committee, the Republican Speaker did not allow a floor vote of the lifesaving bill.
Additional photos of then-Commissioner Jones at our lunch-time pro-enforcement rally outside the offices of then-U.S. Senator Saxby Chambliss can be seen here (page 2). You can see and hear Rep Jones’ entire speech last night below.
August 24, 2020Response – – open records request to Hall County Business License Division Re: Vital Foods #1 *CLICK ON DOCS TO SEE ALL ATTACHED
August 21, 2020GDOL Open records request DDS![]() Image GA DOL
The below open records request was sent via email on August 18, 2020 at 11:26 AM. The initial response is posted here.
_ Mr. Timothy Mitchell
General Counsel
Georgia Department of Labor
Mr. Mitchell, Please regard this email as my official request for copies of Georgia Department of Labor (GDOL) documents and records under state public records law. I note that GDOL has an entry on its website (FAQs) informing readers that GDOL uses the Georgia Department of Drivers Services (DDS) to verify the lawful presence required by state law (OCGA 50-36-1) for aliens to qualify for public benefits.
State law (OCGA 50-36-1) passed in 2006 and amended in 2009, 2011, 2012, 2013 mandates that this verification process for lawful presence be done using the federal SAVE program operated by the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). 1) Please send me a copy of any authorization or replacement law that would alter the GDOL requirement for SAVE verification and/or change verification source to DDS – including bill number, year passed into law and code section. 2) Please send me copies of any and all GDOL documents, emails, memorandums or policy files that pertain to or mention GDOL requesting or discussing a change in state law regarding GDOLâs direct use of the SAVE program and transferring the lawful presence verification to DDS with a time frame of from 1 January 2013 to 15 August 2020. 3) Please send me a copy of any agreement, MOU/MOA between USCIS and GDOL authorizing GDOL to use the SAVE program including original agreement and all renewals from July 1, 2006 to 15 August, 2020. 4) Please send me a copy of any official agreement between GDOL and DDS pertaining to DDS being the source and authority of verification of lawful presence of non-citizen applicants who apply for public benefits at GDOL – including any email, memorandums or proposals for GDOL to use DDS to verify lawful presence of GDOL applicants for public benefits. 5) Please send me a copy of any document that may illustrate the most recent date of a GDOL query to the SAVE program for verification of lawful presence of an applicant for the public benefit of unemployment insurance or other public benefit administered by GDOL. 6) Please send me copies of any/all internal GDOL email or memorandums or policy discussions that mention ‘Permanent Residence Under Color of Law’ (PRUCOL) including GDOL policy on PRUCOL creating eligibility for lawful presence or unemployment insurance and any correspondence between GDOL and DDS pertaining to PRUCOL. 7) Please send me a copies of any document or electronic form that serves as a transmittal of information from GDOL to DDS of information gathered from GDOL collected applications for unemployment insurance benefits. 8) Please send me copies of any and all internal email, memorandums, policy statement or records or correspondence pertaining to or mentioning federal deferred action on deportation or the Obama-invented DACA program for illegal aliens with a time frame of 1 July, 2012 to 15 August, 2020. 9) Please send me copies of any emails, memorandums or inquiries that ask for information on GDOL administering and or issuing unemployment insurance benefits for illegal aliens who have DACA status or other deferred action on deportation status. 10) Please send me copies of any/all GDOL emails, memorandums or internal correspondence pertaining to or mentioning the March 6, 2019 Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals finding that DACA recipients do not have lawful presence or legal status and are inadmissible and removable under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). For clarity, I link to that finding here. 11) Please send me any record or document that shows the response code received from the SAVE program to a query from GDOL on immigration status of an applicant with DACA status for unemployment insurance. 12) Please send any document, record, table or index that shows all possible responses and codes used by the SAVE program to answer GDOL queries on immigration status for applicants for public benefits including unemployment insurance benefits. Please contact me at any time with questions on my request. Please expect this request to be one of several with a goal of gaining a clear and accurate understanding of GDOL policy and operations on administering public benefits/unemployment insurance. Thank you for a timely reply. I look forward to your itemized estimate of research costs for my request. Respectfully, D.A. King Marietta, GA.
A Probate Court judge on DACA and weapons carry * WCLA reply to questions on illegal aliens with DACA ability to qualify for a Georgia Weapons Carry License (WCL) from a Probate Judge in a Metro-Atlanta area county “A person who is a non-immigrant alien – like someone who is here on some type of temporary status, be it for school or work – can qualify for Weapons Carry License provided they are in good standing with ICE and can show they meet one of the exceptions found at 18 U.S.C. §922(y)(2), one of which would be a person holding a valid hunting license. I’m not sure what a person who is a DACA recipient is categorized as, but if it’s a non-immigrant alien then I would assume they could receive a WCL (provided the exception is shown).” And “For us, it all depends on what information we are provided by ICE. When a person comes in to apply for a WCL and they are NOT a U.S. citizen (such as a permanent resident or a non-immigrant alien), we are required to run a check through ICE to determine that personâs status. If ICE says they are not here legally or they are subject to deportation proceedings, they are not issued a WCL because they are not able to possess or ship a weapon in interstate commerce and are, thus, prohibited from receiving a WCL pursuant to O.C.G.A. §16-11-129(b)(2)(E) . If ICE says they are a non-resident alien validly here, then we donât issue them a WCL unless they show that they meet one of the exceptions under 18 U.S.C. §922(y)(2) â which would realistically only be a person possessing a valid hunting license. I donât know how ICE categorizes DACA cases in terms of these searches â I only know the information they give me on whether their status is as far as ICE is concerned. I should add that I look at every application of a person who is not a U.S. citizen and can say that, in my 11 + years as judge, I can count on one hand the number of non-resident aliens that have applied for and received a WCL. In fact, I think there have only been two â one guy from the UK and one guy from Italy. There may have been others who have applied but either did not qualify because ICE said they werenât here legally or they did qualify but have never shown they have met one of the exceptions (such as providing a hunting license).” Federal Court says illegal aliens with DACA is an illegal alien and cannot lawfully own a firearm -“Dreamer” Dreams of the Right to Own a Gun![]() Illegal aliens protest in Atlanta for in-state tuition in Georgia’s public universities. Photo: Education Writers Assoc.
The Volokh Conspiracy GUNS  – “Dreamer” Dreams of the Right to Own a GunDream on, says a federal district court. EUGENE VOLOKH |THE VOLOKH CONSPIRACY | 6.28.2018 Kevin Ugurit Fierro-Morales is being prosecuted for possessing a short-barreled shotgun, and for possessing a firearm while “being an alien” “illegally or unlawfully in the United States” (in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5)(A)). But when he was arrested, he was covered by the Defered Action for Childhood Arrivals programâshould that lead him to be treated as lawfully present, and as entitled to Second Amendment rights? (Set aside the separate charge short-barreled shotgun charge for now.) No and no, a federal district court in San Diego held Tuesday. First, DACA made clear that President Obama’s action didn’t itself confer legal status: “[T]he provisions of DACA promising to defer removal and to authorize work did not confer lawful immigration status or create ambiguity as to the prohibitions of § 922(g)(5)(A).” Second, the Second Amendment applies only to the responsible and law-abiding, whether just “responsible, law-abiding citizens” or also responsible, law-abiding permanent residents or even responsible, law-abiding temporary visitors. (The court doesn’t decide on the rights of legal aliens.) Congress may ban “possession of firearms by an alien in the United States with no legal status,” and DACA recipients don’t have legal status. (I’m oversimplifying the court’s Second Amendment discussion a bit, but that’s the gist.) Here. “In this case, the Court concludes that Defendantâs acceptance into DACA announced by the Department of Homeland Security did not alter his immigration status or materially impact the determination whether he is âillegally or unlawfully in the United Statesâ pursuant to § 922(g)(5)(A). As in Abramski, there is nothing suggesting that Congress intended to exclude aliens âillegally or unlawfully in the United Statesâ accepted in the DACA Program from the statutory provision in § 922(g)(5)(A). See Latu, 479 F.3d at 1159 (âabsent a statute preventing Latuâs removability upon the filing of his application for adjustment status, we can envision no interpretation that renders Latuâs presence anything other than âillegal[] or unlawful[].ââ). August 19, 2020August 17, 2020Next Page » |