July 14, 2018

ICE: SAN DIEGO CHAINSAW ATTACKER IS ILLEGAL ALIEN WHO HAS BEEN DEPORTED 11 TIMES

Posted by D.A. King at 1:35 pm - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

Daily Caller

At the Escondido City Council meeting Maribel Solache, sitting with her daughter Valentina, 11, both supporters of the proposed immigrant shelter for kids in the city, holds a sign directed at people sitting across the room who are against the shelter. (Charlie Neuman – San Diego Union Tribune)

 

July 14, 2018

ICE: SAN DIEGO CHAINSAW ATTACKER IS ILLEGAL ALIEN WHO HAS BEEN DEPORTED 11 TIMES

Alvarez has a long record of being deported and returning to the U.S., according to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

A California man who allegedly attacked his wife with a chainsaw is an illegal alien who has been deported at least 11 times since 2005, immigration officials confirmed Friday.

Alejandro Alvarez Villegas, 32, was arrested Thursday in Chula Vista, California, a suburb of San Diego, on allegations that he tried to kill his wife with a chainsaw in front of their three children.

Alvarez has a long record of being deported and returning to the U.S., according to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

“Department of Homeland Security databases indicate Mr. Alvarez-Villegas is a serial immigration violator who has been removed from the United States 11 times since 2005,” an ICE spokesperson said, according to NBC 7 San Diego.The incident began Wednesday, when police in the Los Angeles suburb of Whittier responded to a domestic violence call and found Alvarez’s wife inside their home with chest wounds caused by a chainsaw. The next day, Chula Vista police pulled over Alvarez in an SUV that had been reported stolen in Los Angeles… More here.

July 10, 2018

Letters sent here by Billy Inman (Dustin’s Dad) – it appears they went to Angel Parents just after they were hosted by President Trump at the White House last month

Posted by D.A. King at 5:08 pm - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

Trump grants DACA amnesty to 20,572 illegal aliens

Posted by D.A. King at 4:55 pm - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

NICK WAGNER / AMERICAN-STATESMAN

 

Despite the Trump Administration’s rescission of the #DACA program in September, 2017, USCIS approved 20,572 new applications between October 2017 and June 2018 — 7 months before Federal District Judge Bates ruled the Administration’s rescission illegal.

July 5, 2018

Viva Zero Tolerance!

Posted by D.A. King at 11:54 am - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

Supreme Court Says Foreign Nationals Have No Due Process Rights Here

Posted by D.A. King at 11:14 am - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

LifeZette

July 5, 2018

Supreme Court Says Foreign Nationals Have No Due Process Rights Here

Contrary to what the liberal media and open-borders advocates say, immigrants are not owed same constitutional protections as regular Americans
by Matt O’Brien

President Donald Trump recently suggested that illegal aliens should be sent back to their countries of origin without hearings and the years of litigation that often follow.

He branded the current process, which permits illegal aliens to repeatedly contest orders of removal, as “a mockery to good immigration policy and law and order.”

The mainstream media wasted no time in characterizing his suggestion as a “push to end due process for illegal immigrants.” And multiple news outlets made all manner of wild claims about the so-called rights of illegal aliens. But once again, in an effort to portray the chief executive as a xenophobe, the open-borders lobby has gotten its facts backward.

Trump is actually right on the mark. Much of the current legal framework for removing illegal aliens from the United States consists of badly reasoned federal district-court decisions, ridiculous settlement agreements, and politically motivated policy decisions.

The open-borders lobby and its handmaidens in the mainstream media have consistently represented this hodgepodge as a clear articulation of “affirmative rights.”

But that representation is misleading.  Read more here…

BTW: IT’S A SCAM! Justice Department data showed 56 percent of recent immigrants who made “credible fear” claims had not taken the next step to file for asylum, raising doubts about the claim.

Posted by D.A. King at 10:40 am - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

Washington Secrets

July 3, 2018

1,350% jump in deportation orders for sham asylum claims by illegal immigrants

A majority of immigrants seeking asylum in the United States by claiming “credible fear” back home do not actually file for it once they are released into the country, resulting in a massive effort to find and deport them, according to the Trump administration.

Earlier this year, for example, Justice Department data provided to Secrets showed that 56 percent of recent immigrants who made “credible fear” claims had not taken the next step to file for asylum, raising doubts about their initial claim.

And it’s not a new issue: 65 percent of pending cases that originated from credible fear have not resulted in an asylum application, and since since 2006, 53 percent never filed an asylum application…read more here.

When Democrats cry ‘Abolish ICE,’ they really mean ‘abolish borders’

Posted by D.A. King at 10:29 am - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

photo The Hill

The Hill

When Democrats cry ‘Abolish ICE,’ they really mean ‘abolish borders’
BY MARK KRIKORIAN, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — 07/04/18

Are we going to have immigration limits or not?

That’s the question underlying the calls for the abolition of Immigration and Customs and Enforcement (ICE), the bureau within the Department of Homeland Security responsible for upholding our immigration rules away from the borders.

The push to #AbolishICE is threatening to become a litmus test for Democratic politicians. It has been embraced by presidential hopefuls like Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), as well as other far-left figures such as New York Mayor Bill de Blasio, actress-turned-New York gubernatorial candidate Cynthia Nixon, and a number of House members.

Despite the efforts of some senior Democrats to try to tamp down the anti-borders fervor of their base for fear of political backlash, the energy in the Democratic party is clearly on the far left. In the words of activist Sean McElwee, a co-founder of AbolishICE.org:

“I believe that every Democrat running in the 2020 Presidential Election will have to articulate a vision of a world without ICE.”

The most charitable interpretation of the #AbolishICE craze is that it’s the left’s version of the silly call by some on the right to abolish the IRS. If taxes are still going to be collected, and immigration laws enforced, then changing the initials of the agency doing the work is nothing but a political stunt.

Even if it were simply a political stunt, the push to #AbolishICE would tell us something significant. Republicans who call for dissolving the IRS do so as a way of signaling the depth of their opposition to taxes. Likewise, #AbolishICE is a Democratic candidate’s way of communicating to voters that he dislikes immigration limits and the enforcement required to make them meaningful.

But the Democrats calling to eliminate ICE aren’t simply engaged in empty posturing. The event that sparked the cascade of Democrats calling for the abolition of the immigration-enforcement agency was the upset victory of socialist Alexandria Ocacio-Cortez in a New York congressional primary. Her call for dissolving ICE is not just about the initials, but about the very laws that these overworked and underappreciated federal officers enforce.

Under the heading “Immigration Justice / Abolish ICE”, her campaign website argues “It’s time to abolish ICE, clear the path to citizenship, and protect the rights of families to remain together.” The second item in this list means amnesty for illegal aliens, while the third point effectively means that illegal aliens with U.S.-citizen or legal-resident relatives will get to stay.

The push to abolish ICE is the outgrowth of the growing belief on the left that no illegal alien should ever be deported unless they’ve been convicted of a non-immigration crime. Ocasio-Cortez alluded to this when she wrote that “We have to replace ICE with an updated INS-like structure that handles crime through the same court system we’ve had for well over 100 years.” This is gibberish, of course, since INS agents did precisely the same thing as ICE agents working on immigration, most of which did not involve criminal violations of immigration law but civil ones, which are handled by deportation, not imprisonment. READ MORE HERE.

Court Rules Copying Photos Found on Internet is Fair Use

Posted by D.A. King at 9:53 am - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

photo: Peta Pixel

 

Michael Zhang, reporting for PetaPixel:
A Virginia federal court has made a decision that photographers won’t be happy to hear: the court ruled that finding a photo on the Internet and then using it without permission on a commercial website can be considered fair use. The copyright battle started when photographer Russell Brammer found one of his long-exposure photos of a Washington, D.C. neighborhood cropped and used by the website for the Northern Virginia Film Festival on a page of “things to do” in the D.C. area.

Brammer then sent a cease and desist letter to Violent Hues Productions, the company behind the festival, and it responded by immediately taking the photo down. Brammer then sued the company for copyright infringement, and it responded by claiming fair use. In his ruling, the judge said, “Violent Hues’ use of the photograph was transformative in function and purpose. While Brammer’s purpose in capturing and publishing the photograph was promotional and expressive, Violent Hues’ purpose in using the photograph was informational: to provide festival attendees with information regarding the local area. Furthermore, this use was noncommercial, because the photo was not used to advertise a product or generate revenue.”

Here.

‘About 60 Organizations’ Are Considering a Lawsuit Against the SPLC Following $3M Nawaz Settlement

Posted by D.A. King at 9:47 am - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

photo -need to know news

 

‘About 60 Organizations’ Are Considering a Lawsuit Against the SPLC Following $3M Nawaz Settlement
Here.

SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER SETTLES LAWSUIT AFTER FALSELY LABELING ‘EXTREMIST’ ORGANIZATION #SPLC

Posted by D.A. King at 9:45 am - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER SETTLES LAWSUIT AFTER FALSELY LABELING ‘EXTREMIST’ ORGANIZATION
Here.

« Previous PageNext Page »