Open borders Marxists have to resort to childish name calling
Name-calling is pretty serious for kids. Remember how elementary school kids used name-calling as a bullying tactic? There wasn’t much rationale behind it. It was intended to intimidate, ridicule, and diminish the victim.
Yet it’s pretty funny when those who are purportedly adults resort to name-calling as a tactic of attempted intimidation.
There are very good reasons to enforce immigration law, as noted in the article My Secret Plan to Destroy America, by Dick Lamm, former Governor of Colorado. Another is that mass immigration is driving America’s population to double within the lifetimes of children born today.
Those who support immigration reduction and immigration law enforcement are accustomed to being called names such as racist, nativist, and white nationalist.* That’s it? That’s all that the open borders Marxists can come up with? No arguments of substance, no plethora of factual evidence to substantiate their point?
The joke’s on them! Anyone with half a brain can see through the shallow, childish attacks. Especially when babbled repetitiously by the Marxist mouthpieces of mass immigration.
The Big Lie
The Big Lie is a formal debating strategy where a falsehood so colossal is told that no one would dare question it. Incessant repetition gels its undeniable existence. The Big Lie was coined by Adolf Hitler in his 1925 book, Mein Kampf.
One of the most common Big Lies we hear is that “We’re a nation of immigrants.” Really? I’m not. Are you?
America is a nation of American citizens. A very small fraction of Americans are legal immigrants, and a larger fraction are illegal aliens who evaded capture at our border. In our past, the vast open spaces of America were settled by American settlers, some of whom were immigrants. In perspective, of course, every nation is ultimately a nation of immigrants – there are no documented cases of people sprouting directly out of the soil.
Another Big Lie is that the Statue of Liberty is a tribute to mass immigration. It’s not. See the articles listed below to learn more about the third-rate poem that happened to win a fund-raising contest.
The ad hominem attack
An ad hominem attack is a formal debating tactic of attacking your opponent’s character as opposed to answering their argument. It is a de facto admission of the inability to win the debate on the merits of one’s argument alone.
Accusation of racism is a form of an ad hominem attack. Name-calling – that is, the ad hominem attack – is a popular tool of cultural Marxists, mainly because that’s all they’ve got.
More attacks
More formal debating strategies – also knows as logical fallacies – are summarized in Logical Fallacies and the Art of Debate and Master List of Logical Fallacies.
Other methods of attacking ideas and specific opponents prevail. Most notable are those delineated in Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals. In particular, Rule 13 has been applied with vigor by the open borders leftists:
Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.”
For example, open borders Marxists have repeatedly attacked John Tanton, who single-handedly fostered huge advances in the environmental and immigration sanity domains. See A Case Study in Disinformation – Attacking John Tanton. Other examples are noted in these articles: Alinsky Does Amnesty and the Political Persecution of Dinesh DâSouza.
The joke’s on them!
When you come across a racist attack levied against an immigration patriot – that is, a repetitious rehash of contorted material previously contrived, ask yourself:
What are they trying to prove? Is this the best argument they can come up with? It’s gotta be a joke, right? Nobody could deliberately want to look that childish, inept, and stupid.
References
* Crazy SPLC smears black woman as white nationalist, by Fred Elbel, CAIRCO, November 5, 2015:
“As a black American, I am outraged at the lengths the hate-mongering left goes to smear advocates for sanity and control regarding immigration….
So if you subscribe to the SPLC and IMAGINE 2050 because you think they are fighting for minority Americans, youâve been scammed, duped and used. They lie about anyone who doesnât fall in line and with their anti-American ideology. Just as they lied about me, Ms. Espinoza, U.S. Inc. and everyone who attended the educational event in Washington….”
– Inger Eberhart, MBA, MA, Advisory Board member: The Dustin Inman Society, Writer: The Social Contract Press, Californians for Population Stabilization
The Practice of Ritual Defamation – How Values, Opinions, and Beliefs Are Controlled in Democratic Societies, by Laird Wilcox, The Social Contract, Spring 2010:
An important rule in ritual defamation is to avoid engaging in any kind of debate over the truthfulness or reasonableness of what has been expressed, only condemn it. To debate opens the issue up for examination and discussion of its merits, and consideration of the evidence that may support it, which is just what the ritual defamer is trying to avoid. The primary goal of a ritual defamation is censorship and repression….
It is not used to persuade, but to punish. Although it may have cognitive elements, its thrust is primarily emotional. Ritual defamation is used to hurt, to intimidate, to destroy, and to persecute, and to avoid the dialogue, debate, and discussion upon which a free society depends. On those grounds it must be opposed no matter who tries to justify its use.
Learn more about the widely discredited SPLC hate group
Time to Remove Socialist âHuddled Massesâ Plaque from Statue of Liberty, by Selwyn Duke, Canada Free Press, February 2, 2018
Huddled masses and deceptive clichés
Statue of Liberty – Liberty Enlightening the World
The Statue of Liberty stands firm on liberty, not a poem, enlightening the world