Marietta Daily Journal
Opinion
November 18, 2016

D.A. KING: Anti-Trump rioters, the evil payoff of eight years of Barack Obama ‘Patriotism is racist’

Oh, happy, happy day! Oh, glorious relief! The surprising results of last week’s presidential election mean the Founders’ republic has a chance of survival after all. The reign of Alinsky-ite Barack Hussein Obama will soon end.

Saul Alinsky admirer and global grifter Hillary Rodham Clinton will not be allowed to peddle favors from the Pennsylvania Avenue. And she will not be able to set up her own server in a White House residence bathroom closet. Or filch the silver. Good riddance to the Clintons.

With Donald Trump as president, maybe, just maybe — if we can overcome the open borders influence of Republican Speaker Paul Ryan — Americans will eventually see our borders secured and our immigration and employment laws enforced. But don’t bet on it.

Maybe we have actually elected a president who truly loves America and Americans. That would be real change.

For those who are not familiar with Saul Alinsky’s instructions on how to destroy the Unites States from within, be advised that he began his 1971 “Rules for Radicals” how-to book with a dedication to Satan. “Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology and history … the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer.”

Donald Trump’s election gives us a clear and unmistakable look into the results of decades of “everybody gets a trophy,” Alinsky’s anti-Americanism in our schools and what eight years of fundamentally-transforming Marxism from Obama has done to the 20-somethings who were 12-ish when he was elected.

In the ongoing weeklong nationwide tantrum-riots from snarling gangs of brick-throwing liberal Millennials who have never been told “no,” we have seen the results of true, homegrown evil. Alinsky would be quite proud. Outraged at the outcome of Nov. 8, they are screaming in the streets that Trump — and the police — should be murdered.

Another placard at an anti-Trump street-scream reads “Rape Melania” — the future first lady.

All the while, these disgusting products of the Obama years wave placards in the faces of news cameras that exclaim “Stop the Hate!”

Taught that “racism” is anything they don’t agree with, there is no note of irony when “Confront Whiteness” and “*&@% White People” is scrawled in spray paint on buildings by the clueless demonstrators.

Safe at home and comfortably far away from their contemporaries who are dodging IEDs and bullets in foreign lands, angry “Trump is not my President” protesters around the country laughed for the cameras while they burned the Stars and Stripes — on Veterans Day.

Nearly a week after Hillary’s defeat, Monday’s election-riot photos brought an image of a well-dressed young Chicago woman marching in a howling crowd carrying a sign that reads “Patriotism is Racist.”

They are protesting Democracy.

Imagine the media reaction to any of this if it had happened after the presidential election eight years ago.

How spoiled are they? News reports from a the local NBC affiliate TV station show that more than 50 percent of the anti-Trump rioters arrested in Portland, Oregon, in the days following the election did not bother to vote. “A search of state election records was conducted by a Portland television station which reported that of the 112 protesters that were arrested, 69 of them could not be found to have turned in a ballot or were not registered to vote in the Beaver State,” says a Breitbart News report.

Many of the young and panicked have taken to wearing a safety pin as a symbol of their desperate need for a “safe place.” Their emblem choice is easily confused with a diaper pin. One of our favorite placards from these genius rebels without a clue reads “Deport Fashisom.”

Many glowing Trump voters — including this one — are wondering why so many liberals are now promising to move to Canada to escape the America they told us just weeks ago is “already great.” Um, why aren’t they migrating to Mexico?

The election of Donald Trump should be viewed as a national referendum on the liberalism and agenda of Barack Obama. He must leave the White House, and it can’t be soon enough. And he can keep his legacy. Just like Americans could keep their doctors.

Oh, happy day. After eight years of Obama, liberal tears taste so sweet. HERE

“U.S.-born workers accounted for a majority of workers in all major occupation groups…”

Pew Research Center

November 3, 2016

Occupations of unauthorized immigrant workers
BY JEFFREY S. PASSEL AND D’VERA COHN

Although unauthorized immigrants made up 5% of the nation’s civilian workforce in 2014, they accounted for a much higher share (26%) of the workers in farming occupations. Unauthorized immigrants also were 15% of workers in construction jobs in 2014. U.S.-born workers accounted for a majority of workers in all major occupation groups, including 54% of the farming workforce in 2014 and 73% of the construction workforce. Only in construction jobs and farming jobs do unauthorized immigrant workers outnumber lawful immigrant workers (15% vs. 12%, and 26% vs. 20%). (See the table here for data on workers’ status by major occupation.)

Unauthorized immigrants also were somewhat overrepresented in 2014 in production jobs, which include manufacturing, food processing and textile occupations, where they were 9% of the workforce. In 2014, unauthorized immigrants also held 9% of service jobs, a larger share than their 5% of the overall workforce.

However, unauthorized immigrants made up only 2% each of management, professional and office support workers. In those occupational categories, U.S.-born workers made up at least 85% of the jobholders.

As with industries, there are some very specific occupations with particularly high concentrations of unauthorized immigrant workers. The occupations tend to be subgroups of the major occupations with the highest shares of unauthorized immigrant workers. The occupations where at least one-quarter of workers are unauthorized immigrants include drywall installers (31% in 2014), miscellaneous agricultural workers (30%), roofers (29%), construction painters (26%) and brick masons (25%). U.S.-born workers, however, account for the largest share of workers in all these occupations. (See the table here for data on these and other specific occupations.)

Compared with U.S.-born workers, unauthorized immigrant workers are more likely to be employed in service and construction occupations. About a third of unauthorized immigrant workers (32% in 2014) are employed in service occupations, compared with 17% of U.S.-born workers who hold these types of jobs. Construction jobs employed 16% of unauthorized immigrant workers in 2014, triple the share of U.S.-born workers (5%) in those occupations. Production and maintenance jobs employed 14% of unauthorized immigrant workers in 2014, but 9% of U.S.-born workers. Only 4% of unauthorized immigrant workers held farming jobs in 2014, but about 1% of U.S.-born workers did.

Among unauthorized immigrant workers, 6% held management jobs in 2014, compared with 15% of U.S.-born workers who did. An additional 8% were in professional occupations, compared with 22% of U.S.-born workers. Sales and office support occupations employed 13% of unauthorized immigrant workers, compared with 25% of U.S.-born workers who held these types of jobs.

State occupation patterns

At the state level, farming is overwhelmingly the occupation where unauthorized immigrants make up the highest share of the workforce.4

It is the top occupation by this measure in 32 states. For the nation, unauthorized immigrant workers are overrepresented in farming jobs, where they made up 26% of workers in 2014 compared with the overall workforce, where they represented 5% of U.S. workers. Construction ranks first in nine states. Nationally, unauthorized immigrant workers held 15% of construction jobs in 2014.

However, when looked at from the perspective of the distribution of the unauthorized immigrant workforce, service occupations rank first in 37 states and the District of Columbia. Service occupations also dominate at the national level, employing 32% of the unauthorized immigrant workforce. (See tables here for the top occupations for unauthorized immigrants by state in 2014)…READ MORE HERE

Pagination

Immigration issue hits home for local man

Posted: Nov 16, 2016 9:03 AM EST
Updated: Nov 16, 2016 9:33 AM EST

CBS46 News
Read more: http://www.cbs46.com/story/33723177/undocumented-immigrants-fear-deportation-after-new-administration-elected#ixzz4QByP8ZPj,code>

ATLANTA (CBS46) –

He campaigned on a promise to crack down on illegal immigrants currently living in the U.S. and now that he’s been elected, Donald Trump says he’s going to follow through with his plans.

Trump said he would immediately begin the process of deporting undocumented immigrants with criminal records but those already living here who haven’t been convicted of a crime are fearful of what the new policies mean for them.

Advocates of the plan, like Bill Inman want the estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants deported. For Inman, the issue is personal.

His wife Kathy is in a wheelchair after she and the couple’s only son Dustin were involved in a drunk-driving crash 16 years ago with an alleged undocumented immigrant behind the wheel. The crash killed Dustin, who was 16 years-old at the time.

“I don’t get to hug my son,” said Inman. “I don’t get to have him help me do whatever in the yard or on the truck. I won’t be a grandpa.”

Inman says the driver accused of killing Dustin and severely injuring his wife was never convicted and returned to Mexico. He isn’t afraid to speak his mind and says he is hopeful that Trump will follow through on his campaign promise.
Trump has softened his stance on deportation since being elected but still says he plans to begin proceedings on the 20 to 3 million people who have been convicted of a felony after crossing into the U.S. illegally.

On the other side of the coin, those undocumented immigrants already living in the U.S. who have not committed a felony remain fearful as they wait to find out what will happen. One such person who wants to remain anonymous crossed over into the U.S. 17 years ago. She is a working mother of three and she say she and her children are living in fear.

“My younger son, he’s afraid. He’s just scared. He’s asking me the question if I’m getting deported,” the woman told CBS46 News.

Carlos Garcia of the Pro-Immigrant Alliance says calls have more than doubled to his organization from Georgians who have crossed into the U.S. illegally, wondering what will happen to them. While Garcia supports deportation of those convicted of violent crimes, he wonders where it will stop.

“The only thing we’re worried about is this is going to create some form of persecution against people who has a need to drive to work. Hard working families, splitting them apart,” said Garcia.

Copyright 2016 WGCL-TV (Meredith Corporation). All rights reserved.
Read more:

David North
November 15, 2016
Center for Immigration Studies

Georgia May Get $100 Million More in Revenue; Citizens Wouldn’t Pay a Dime
By David North, November 15, 2016

The State of Georgia could raise as much as $100 million in new revenues without costing the state’s voters a dime.

It could do this by tapping into money sent abroad by aliens, many of them in illegal status — and money sent abroad by drug dealers, as well, whatever their status.

This will happen if a bill expected to be introduced by State Rep. Jeff Jones (R -Brunswick) is passed by the state legislature and signed by the governor. The bill has not yet been introduced, and thus does not have a legislative number. I am told all this by a highly reliable source in Atlanta.

The bill would bring to Georgia a system that has worked well in Oklahoma for years. It would place a 2 percent fee on all personal (not corporate) wire transfers of money sent out of state. The 2 percent would be returned to the payers when they filed their income tax returns, either as a credit toward their tax or a refund if the sender’s income is low enough.

The beauty of the program is that most of the money now being wired out of Georgia, usually to aliens’ home countries, is not now being taxed. Oklahoma tax officials told me in the past that only a very small percentage of the fees they collect are claimed in the next year’s income tax returns.

So the transfer fee will cost law-abiding taxpayers little or nothing, but will collect most of its revenues from previously untaxed sources; including a lot from the incomes of illegal aliens.

Where do I get the $100 million estimate? It works like this: Oklahoma has about 95,000 illegal aliens according to the most recent Pew Research Center estimate, while Georgia, according to the same source has about four times as many, 375,000. So that’s a four-to-one ratio.

Meanwhile, Oklahoma has set the fee at 1 percent, while Jones suggests 2 percent. That adds up to an eight-to-one differential. The latest data, for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016, show that Oklahoma collected $12,696,976 in these fees. Multiply that by eight and this produces an estimate of more than $100 million.

Oklahoma’s experience is that this income increases by 10 to 12 percent a year.

My advice to Rep. Jones would be to modify his fee structure. Currently the bill calls for a 2 percent fee plus $10; this would cost, for a $200 check $14, or 7 percent; for $1,000 it would cost $30, or 3 percent. Tilting the formula against the little guy is, sadly, one of the things we do these days, and this could be a source of opposition. On the other hand, there has to be a minimum fee to cover the cost of the paperwork.

So it would seem to be better to have a $10 fee or 2 percent, whichever is higher. Oklahoma’s formula is $10 or 1 percent, whichever is higher. The fee for a $200 check sent from Georgia would then be 5 percent, and for the $1,000 one it would be 2 percent. That formula would stir up less opposition. Further, I gather that the Jones bill will, wisely, pay the wire transfer operators a small fee for handling these arrangements; that should reduce any opposition from the industry.

And, of course, very, very few law-abiding Georgia taxpayers would actually be paying these transfer fees. HERE

OCGA 7-1-4

(21) “Financial institution” means:

(A) A bank;

(B) A trust company;

(C) Reserved;

(D) A credit union;

(E) A corporation licensed to engage in the business of selling payment instruments in this state on April 1, 1975, or so licensed pursuant to Article 4 of this chapter;

(F) Business development corporations existing on April 1, 1975, pursuant to the former “Georgia Business Development Corporation Act of 1972,” approved April 3, 1972 (Ga. L. 1972, p. 798), or organized pursuant to Article 6 of this chapter;

(G) An international bank agency doing business in this state on April 1, 1975, pursuant to the former “International Bank Agency Act,” approved April 6, 1972 (Ga. L. 1972, p. 1140), or authorized to do business in this state pursuant to Article 5 of this chapter;

(H) In addition, as the context requires, a national bank, savings and loan association, or federal credit union for the purpose of the following provisions:

(i) Code Section 7-1-2, relating to findings of the General Assembly;

(ii) Code Section 7-1-8, relating to supplementary principles of law;

(iii) Code Section 7-1-37, relating to restrictions on officials and personnel;

(iv) Code Section 7-1-70, relating to disclosure of information;

(v) Code Section 7-1-90, relating to judicial review of department action;

(vi) Code Sections 7-1-111 and 7-1-112, relating to emergency closings and business restrictions;

(vii) Paragraph (3) of subsection (a) of Code Section 7-1-394, relating to criteria to be considered in approving new banks;

(viii) Code Section 7-1-840, relating to criminal prosecutions; and

(ix) Code Section 7-1-841, relating to application of Title 16 provisions;

(I) A bank holding company as defined in Code Section 7-1-605 for the purposes of Code Sections 7-1-61, 7-1-71, and 7-1-91;

(J) Banks chartered by states other than Georgia for the purposes of paragraph (10) of Code Section 7-1-261, relating to agency relationships; and

(K) Federal credit unions for the purposes of Part 6 of Article 2 of this chapter, relating to deposits, safe-deposit agreements, and money received for transmission, and Article 8 of this chapter, relating to multiple-party accounts.

Breitbart News
by JULIA HAHN

11 Oct 2015

EXCLUSIVE– NumbersUSA President: Paul Ryan ‘Terrifying,’ ‘Open Borders Seeps Out of Every Pore Of His Being’

As donor class Republicans and beltway pundits intensify their “Draft Ryan” campaign, anti-amnesty advocates are pleading with House Republicans to quash the candidacy of the man they call the most open-borders member of Congress.
While these advocates have largely refrained in the past from getting involved in the House leadership scuffle, they now have an urgent warning for House members. They contend that Paul Ryan is an immigration extremist – and point to historical records placing him at the center of a 1990-era corporate-led sabotage of immigration curbs then sought by both parties.

In an exclusive interview with Breitbart News, the president of the immigration control group NumbersUSA, Roy Beck, described Paul Ryan as “terrifying.”

“There’s nobody in the Republican Party who could be worse than Paul Ryan,” Beck implored. “He has spent his entire adulthood ideologically connected to the open borders crowd. Open Borders is in his ideological DNA. That’s the terrifying thing. He’s an ideologue and his spent his whole life working for ideologues. Open borders seeps out of every pore of his being. This isn’t personal, it’s just who he is.”

Ryan’s ideological fidelity to Eric Cantor and Kevin McCarthy has been well documented. Also well-documented is his intimate alliance with Congressman Luis Gutierrez and Mick Mulvaney to complete Senator Marco Rubio’s amnesty push – earning him Gutierrez’s effusive endorsement for House Speaker. But less discussed, Roy Beck explains, is that Ryan has been at the center of efforts to open America’s border for the last twenty years – playing a starring role in several high-stakes immigration battles that altered forever the future of the GOP and the nation.

In the words of Bloomberg’s John Heilemann, who co-authored the book Game Change with Time Magazine’s Mark Halperin: “[Ryan’s] ties to the pro-immigration mafia ran deep. A protégé of [Cesar] Conda and an ally of [Rick] Swartz [founder of the pro-amnesty National Immigration Forum], Ryan was the staffer who had aided Jack Kemp and William Bennett in their crusade against Proposition 187.”

The Washington Times adds in a 2012 article that Ryan, “worked to water down the strict immigration limits in a bill Rep. Lamar Smith, Texas Republican, was working to pass in the mid-1990s… As a staffer in Washington, he worked for Jack Kemp and Sen. Sam Brownback — both of whom were part of the Republicans’ pro-immigration wing, and who fought crackdown efforts from within their own party… As a congressman, he voted for a 2002 legalization bill, praised the 2006 Senate immigration bill backed by Mr. Bush and co-sponsored a 2009 Democratic bill that would have legalized immigrant farmworkers.”

Most recently, in the words of pro-amnestyIleana Ros-Lehtinen Ryan worked “every day” to pass the mass amnesty bill for all of America’s illegal immigrant population.

Ryan’s immigration journey began as college intern working in Washington, when he developed a relationship with Cesar Conda, one of the nation’s top strategists pursuing mass immigration. Rubio would later tap Conda as his Senate Chief of Staff, to help him devise the Gang of Eight immigration plan and then later to advise his presidential campaign.

As AP wrote in 2012, during his time as an intern, “[Ryan] caught the eye of a top [Senator] Kasten aide, Cesar Conda, who offered Ryan a post on Kasten’s staff after Ryan’s 1992 graduation, his first full-time Washington job.”

As Conda later went on to say, “Every chance he [Paul Ryan] got, he’d take the opportunity to pop his head into my office.” To this day, on Conda’s LinkedIn page, he promotes that he has been “described by the Associated Press as one of Rep. Paul Ryan’s ‘conservative mentors.’” AP notes that Conda continued to play a “pivotal role” throughout Ryan’s career: “In 2007, Conda was an adviser to Romney’s presidential campaign and introduced the two men in Washington. A scheduled 15-minute meeting lasted nearly an hour, Conda said.”

After college, Paul Ryan worked alongside former-New York Congressman Jack Kemp in their coordinated attack California’s Proposition 187, a measure pushed by GOP Governor Pete Wilson – and approved by a wide popular vote – which denied state benefits to illegals and required that they be turned over to federal authorities if caught. The measure was blocked by a judge and never went into effect– if it had, potentially millions of California’s illegals, chain migrants and their children would have returned home, unable to draw benefits or alter the state’s political bent.

As National Review reported in 2013, Paul Ryan told EWTN host Raymond Arroyo,”‘I actually campaigned with Jack Kemp against a thing called Prop 187,’ […] [Ryan] said they both worried that the proposal would burn Republicans within the immigrant community, and ‘make it so that Latino voters would not hear the other messages of empowerment.’”…READ MORE HERE

On Nov 9, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Regina Willis wrote:

Hello D.A. King,

I am a freelance reporter doing a story for Creative Loafing on the immigrant enforcement review board, stemming from your most recent complaint filed with the board against the City of Atlanta. Let me know if you’d be available to discuss this complaint, as well as your previous complaints with the board and your work on HB 87 creating this board.

Thanks so much, and I look forward to speaking with you at your earliest convenience.

Regards,
Regina

—
Regina Willis
Freelance Reporter
e: RWillisD@gmail.com

__

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 11:36 AM, D.A. King wrote:
FYI
Your editors do not have the professional courtesy to return queries about sending in response letters and columns as balance to the anti enforcement goop that shows up in your paper. That was not always the case.
But, I will send you replies to an email interview questions.

dak
__

On Wed, Mov 9, 2016 at 11:48 AM, D.A. King wrote
Regina Willis , sharry.smith@creativeloafing.com, Phil Kent , Tim Bryant

I just read Your Better Georgia “journalism” on ” Georgia Racists/Dax Lopez…” The fact that Creative Loafing has dipped so far into the barrel for free lance is not that surprising. You have no honor and you are not a journalist. But I will still reply to email questions.
dak
__

Hello,

Thanks for agreeing to answer some questions. I’m interested in:

(1) Your work with the IERB. Do you know how many complaints you have filed? What source(s) inform these complaints (e.g. what makes you decide to file an open records request and investigate a certain body)?

(2) What do you hope to accomplish with this most recent complaint against the City of Atlanta?

(3) What have been some of the most important outcomes, in your opinion, from HB 87 in general? From the work of the IERB specifically?

(4) Many folks, myself included (as you have noted), have labeled you and your work as racist. What do you think drives folks to call your work racist/xenophobic? How do you respond to those assertions?

Regards,
Regina

—
Regina (Ari) Willis
Freelance Reporter
e: RWillisD@gmail.com

__

From: “D.A. KING”
Subject: Re: Request for interview
Date: November 9, 2016 at 2:12:32 PM EST
To: Regina Willis
Cc: sharry.smith@creativeloafing.com, debbie.michaud@creativeloafing.com, alicia.carter@creativeloafing.com, Timothy Bryant , Roger Hines

On Nov 9, 2016, at 12:05 PM, Regina Willis wrote:

Hello,

Thanks for agreeing to answer some questions. I’m interested in:

(1) Your work with the IERB. Do you know how many complaints you have filed? What source(s) inform these complaints (e.g. what makes you decide to file an open records request and investigate a certain body)

On November 9, 2016 let me first say “VIVA, DONALD TRUMP!”

I don’t work “with” the IERB. Any registered voter Ga citizen can file a valid complaint.

By my count, before the current one, I have filed four complaints with IERB. One against City of Atlanta for violation of 2011 state law against official acceptence of consular IDs such as the Mexican matricula consular. Results HERE. Because real immigrants can and must obtain and carry US ID, the only people who need documents like the matricula consular are illegal aliens. In an effort to point you and CR readers to the difference between immigrants like my adopted sister and illegal aliens, like the man who killed forever sixteen Dustin Inman, try to remember that because they are here lawfully, immigrants do not require a repeat of the “one time” amnesty of 1986 and that real immigrants are already on a path to citizenship.

At one time I had several matricula ID cards used as a way of showing how insecure they are.

I also filed three other complaints taken from public records which showed literally pages of lists of official entities that had ignored or violated state laws aimed at protecting public benefits for eligible applicants and that official employers like cities and counties don’t hire contractors that use black market labor. This would exclude illegal aliens. Complaints can be found HERE. The IERB stalled for about two years, pointedly said the complaints were too voluminous and summarily discarded one complaint section entirely, saying that they lacked resources to handle so many violations. In the end, only DeKalb county was fined $5000, and that was suspended until the county (just one of pages of violators) demonstrated compliance. There is a very inaccurate write up here from one of your fellow anti-enforcement leftists. Imagine if these same cities and counties had ignored the laws that require free health care treatment and K-12 education to illegal aliens..

I file complaints when I have time. With a little effort, I can locate and document many other violations. It became very obvious that Mayor Reed and his lawyers had re-written and ignored the state law on issuing business licenses and other public benefits without the required sworn statement that the applicant is eligible. Giving public benefits to illegals would be a serious crime in Mexico. Here, not so much. We’ll see. There are a high but unknown number of violations in Atlanta over the course of four years. I file complaints because when it comes to monitoring compliance with immigration laws, Atlanta media usually takes a walk on its responsibility to address official defiance of the law the rest of us are held to.

(2) What do you hope to accomplish with this most recent complaint against the City of Atlanta?

The law provides for serious penalties for officials and public departments that are covered by the law. My hope is that the IERB will use all of its power to send a message to the other officials who are allowed to scoff at the law. Best case? Mayor Reed takes a heavy personal fine as the final authority in charge of what are admitted violations.The citizens of Atlanta should not be required to pay any fines out of the city treasure for Reed’s defiance of state law. I have also filed complaints with the Georgia AG. So far, silence from them. Because of the Chamber of Commerce affiliated state government and having more illegals than Arizona, the Peach State is morphing into “Georgiafornia.”

(3) What have been some of the most important outcomes, in your opinion, from HB 87 in general? From the work of the IERB specifically?

The heart of HB 87 was the E-verify expansion. Despite the endless assurances that it would be a thing of the past from a gaggle of liberal reporters in 2011, Georgians are still eating state-grown peaches, onions and berries. The number of illegal aliens has been reduced, which is what happens in other states where E-Verify is mandated. We still have a long way to go, but the joyus election of “Make America Great Again!” Donald Trump as president may help to increase the outward migration of the victims of borders who lower our wages and challenge our rule of law. The IERB was set up by lobbyists from the very people it is supposed to monitor – ACCG/GMA. There is a very narrow avenue for real enforcement or sanctions. But Mayor Kasim Reed and his administrators have managed to fill all of the requirements for punishment. The 2011 law HB 87 was done due to high public outrage, in an effort to make average citizens assume everything had been taken care of in the organized crime of illegal hiring and illegal immigration. It hasn’t.

(4) Many folks, myself included (as you have noted), have labeled you and your work as racist. What do you think drives folks to call your work racist/xenophobic? How do you respond to those assertions?

People like you use “racist” when they have no way to counter the facts of pro-borders conservatives. I normally let the proud Hispanic Americans and African-Americans on my board reply to these idiot questions. You need to know: “illegal” is not a race. Neither is Hispanic.

I see that you personally have labeled many elected officials as “racist,” including sheriffs. In the limited bubble-world of totalitarian progressives, borders, immigration laws and advocates for an equal application of the law are attacked with the liberal goop of racism. Thanks to years of this race-baiting and these baseless attacks, the American people woke up, took a stand and elected Donald trump president. Like most Americans, including Barbara Jordan, we take a pro-enforcement position on borders and immigration and have the courage to say that there is no universal civil right to live in the USA or to ignore American borders or our system of laws. You, your editors and your readers should try to understand that all nations, including Mexico, have borders, refuse drivers licenses and benefits to illegals, deport illegal aliens and protect their own citizens. You should headline your piece “Everybody I don’t like is Hitler” and call it a day. By the way, most U.S. Border Patrol Agents who are right now risking their lives to protect us are Hispanic Americans. How racist and xenophobic, ehh?

__

On November 9, 2016 at 9:39 PM, D.A. King wrote

Regina Willis , “D.A. KING”
corrected typo for accuracy and grammar – last paragraph of my reply

People like you use “racist” when they have no way to counter the facts of pro-borders conservatives. I normally let the proud Hispanic Americans and African-Americans on my board reply to these idiot questions.You need to know: “illegal” is not a race. Neither is Hispanic. I see thatyou personally have labeled many elected officials as “racist,” including sheriffs. In the limited bubble-world of totalitarian progressives, borders, immigration laws and advocates for an equal application of the law are attacked with the liberal goop of racism. Thanks to years of this race-baiting and these baseless attacks, the American people woke up, took a stand and elected Donald Trump president. Like most Americans, including Barbara Jordan, we take a pro-enforcement position on borders and immigration and have the courage to say that there is no universal civil right to live in the USA or to ignore American borders or our system of laws. You, your editors and your readers should try to understand that other nations, including Mexico, have borders, refuse drivers licenses and benefits to illegals, deport illegal aliens and protect their own citizens. You should headline your piece “Everybody I don’t like is Hitler” and call it a day. By the way, most U.S. Border Patrol Agents who are right now risking their lives to protect us are Hispanic Americans. How racist and xenophobic, ehh?

__

On Nov 14, 2016, at 10:33 AM, Regina Willis <rwillisd@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello D.A. King,

I do have a few follow up questions for you.

__

From D.A. King

On Nov 14, 2016 at 12:22 PM

(1) You’ve mentioned the board using ‘all of its power,’ both in your previous answers to my questions and in comments you made to the board. I get the sense that you are frustrated the board isn’t doing more. How would you ideally like to see the board operate?

Again, the board was dreamed up by lobbyists and lawyers from ACCG/GMA to ‘police’ their own members. It serves as a firewall. Having watched as various official entities have been caught violating the laws in HB 87 and seeing the “OK, now that D.A. King has brought forward these violations, you guys need to cut that out to avoid sanctions…” response from the board, it is difficult not to be frustrated. The IERB has subpoena power and can require the city of Atlanta to produce records that illustrate the scope of violations I have exposed. I am grateful that they voted to do that on this case. These are the clear violations the AJC and other sanctimonious Atlanta media have ignored. The General Assembly should abolish the IERB and the pubic should demand that violations of laws designed to safegaurd public benefits and sanctuary city laws go directly to the same system of enforcement that lowly citizen’s violations do. It should be noted that the AG’s office can still prosecute these violations, regardless of what the IERB does or does not do. Now, if I could only get a response from that office to my complaints…

You may have noticed at least one board member mention that he didn’t think there was “intent” on the part of the city of Atlanta to “knowingly” violate clearly written laws. This is a warm-up to the declaration that despite the Mayor being a former state legislator , despite having a crew of lawyers and advisors, the city of Atlanta “just didn’t understand” that it was administering public benefits in violation of a law ACCG/GMA fought – and the city and the mayor should not suffer and punishment. It’s the Comey/Hillary/bathroom server response to enforcement. Readers should remember that the next time they get a speeding ticket. Try telling the cop you just didn’t know about traffic laws…

(2) What do you make of the fact that you lobbied/advocated for HB 87 and subsequently are the primary person to use the IERB that law created? Why do you think you’re the primary person filing complaints?

Few other people even know the process. Most Americans have no clue how their government really works. Especially on the state and local level. My educated guess is that more people look forward to root canals than know about the IERB – or state law designed to stop illegal aliens from taking benefits and jobs meant for hard working legal immigrants and Americans.

(3) How do you think “the limited bubble-world of totalitarian progressives,” approaches immigration policy?

Ha! With the goal of open borders through thinking less and race-baiting more, the game is to blur the line between honest and law-abiding immigrants and the illegal aliens who are merely undocumented future Democrat-gimme more voters while smearing anyone, regardless of description, who stands up to say we should enforce our immigration and employment laws as enthusiastically and as unapologetically as does Mexico. Most people don’t know we take in more legal immigration than any nation on the planet. More than a million a year. While screaming for better jobs and higher pay, the mindless left joins the Wall St. Journal anything-for-a- buck right in trying for limitless immigration – open borders – clueless to the natural laws of supply and demand. To help out: More workers means lower wages. I grew up in a blue-collar working class family. It is stunning that people accept the ridiculous dogma that we need more immigration to be “fair” – while wages for working Americans are going down in real dollars.
What is your fear about what would happen if those policies went into effect?

It is easy to argue that in part they are already in effect in Obama’s America. Without a reverse, it’s Adios America – official open borders combined with the welfare state that is 21st century America and the current interpretation of birthright citizenship means we would further our current reputation as the ultimate destination for world-wide migration. Most of us prefer a real country to a teeming tower-of-Babel, lawless, welfare-admin region that will soon look more like a sci-fi movie than a constitutional republic with a rule of law if people don’t start recognizing the obvious. I always enjoy asking which laws the “tolerant progressives” want enforced and which ones they chose to ignore. A brilliant answer is evident in watching the freaked-out leftist media snivel and the loving millennials rioting in American streets screaming that Trump and American police should be murdered because they don’t like the results of the election. In today’s bizarro world, “racists” are people who are winning an argument with liberals. With Trump’s election, mainstream America just won a whopper of an argument. To quote about a gazillion conservatives on Twitter lately: “Liberal tears taste so sweet…”

On the border in Arizona. March 2004.

Bill King ( no relation ) : “Bill was a patriot and loved this country. He served in the U. S. Army from 1946-1949 and the U. S. Coast Guard from 1951-1953. In 1957 he joined the U.S. Border Patrol and began 27 years of an illustrious progression through the ranks of the Border Patrol. He worked in locations from Calais, Maine, to San Diego, Calif., and points in between.

Bill was the director of the U. S. Border Patrol Academy and the acting director of the Immigration Officer Academy at FLETC in Glynco, Ga., from 1977-1978. From 1978 until his retirement in 1984 he was the Chief Patrol Agent for the U.S. Border Patrol in El Centro, Calif. After retirement, he served as the Venue Security Manager for the Los Angeles 1984 Olympic Organizing Committee.

In 1985 he commenced an additional five year stint with the federal government with his appointment by President Ronald Reagan as the regional director of the Western Region’s Legalization Program. In this capacity he was responsible for 37 legalization offices that implemented the provisions of the program, which allowed illegal alien amnesty applicants to obtain lawful permanent residence in the United States. Bill and his associates are credited with assisting more than 1.7 million illegal resident aliens to achieve lawful permanent resident status in the United States during this program.

After 1990 he served in various positions as a consultant, manager, or vice president in matters related to immigration with the Alan C. Nelson Foundation, the Ezell Group, Inc., Applied Technology Associates, Inc. and other private firms.

Bill was the recipient of many awards, including the INS Commissioner’s Distinguished Career Service Award, and he was the nominee for the Department of Justice Federal Executive of the Year and the Congressional Excalibur Award. He was recognized by the Attorney General for his outstanding leadership and his contributions to the Immigration and Naturalization Service’s receipt of the National Service Award.”

https://publications.iadb.org/bitstream/handle/11319/489/Brochure %3A%20U.S.%20Map%20of%20Remittances%20to%20Latin%20America%202006.pdf?sequence=1