November 20, 2012

CBS Atlanta TV news report -VIDEO – Consequences of 2012 session’s SB 458 not seeing a final vote

Posted by D.A. King at 9:14 pm - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

SENATE BILL 458 HAD PLENTY OF VOTES TO PASS – 2012 WAS THE FIRST YEAR SINCE 2004 THAT THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY DID NOT PASS ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION LEGISLATION. GEORGIA HAS MORE ILLEGALS THAN DOES ARIZONA AND RANKS NUMBER SIX IN THE NATION IN ILLEGAL POPULATION. THE LOW ESTIMATE IS THAT 7% OF GEORGIA’S WORKFORCE IS BLACK-MARKET LABOR. UNEMPLOYMENT IS 9%. ENGLISH IS AN OPTIONAL LANGUAGE.

1)Professional licenses: Current state law requires agencies that administer public benefits (including the SOS office and most counties and municipalities and many other official agencies) to collect proof of US citizenship each time an individual applies for a public benefit, including renewal of that benefit. While non-citizens legal presence and benefit eligibility can change due to visa expiration or immigration law violation, for the most part, U.S. citizenship status does not change. U.S. citizens should only have to prove that status one time in any one agency. Making this correction will reduce effected agencies workload by about 80 –90%. Aliens would continue to be required to prove eligibility. SB 458 would have remedied that problem.

2) FIXED IN JULY 2012 The AG’s office has excluded birth certificates from the list of acceptable Secure and Verifiable ID documents. Right now and since Jan 1st, literally all drivers’ license and marriage license issuing agencies in Georgia are in violation of the law because they logically accept birth certificates to issue their licenses. SB 458 would have remedied that problem by adding birth certificates to the list. FIXED IN JULY 2012

3) The AG’s office now says that the provision in existing law that allows that office to add to or alter the official list of public benefits is at the least, problematic. SB 458 would have remedied that problem.

4) UNDOCUMENTED PASSPORTS! The AG’s office has made foreign passports Secure and Verifiable ID – but not required that those passports have federal documents attached proving lawful entry into the U.S. Illegal aliens, having escaped capture at the border, simply go to their respective consulates in Atlanta and then get a passport. This completely nullifies the intent and effect of banning the acceptance of Mexican matricula consular and other consulate IDs issued by foreign governments inside the USA last year with HB 87. It allows illegal aliens to seem “documented.” Taking away the ability of illegal aliens to present accepted ID is second only to taking away their employment in encouraging them to migrate out of Georgia. SB 458 would have remedied that problem by requiring proof of lawful entry in officially accepted foreign passports.

5) Note: Since enactment of federal law of 1940, there are no circumstances under which an adult non-citizen (alien) present in the USA is not required to have proof of legal presence on his person at all times. Also,There are about 30 nations for which the federal government waives the visa requirement to enter the US, but even then, there is an entry document issued and stamped (I-94W) and attached to the alien’s passport demonstrating lawful entry and date of required departure.

6) ILLEGAL ALIENS IN GEORGIA’S UNIVERSITY SYSTEM: Originally, the as-passed House Judiciary (non-civil) committee version of SB 458 contained language that banned illegal aliens from the all USG schools – not just the five that Regents policy currently affects. A policy that can be changed at any time. The House committee reinserted language that had been removed in the Senate. Despite the repeated campaign promise from Governor Deal to “do everything possible” to keep illegals out of the university system, he remained silent during the entire session except to have staff tell callers that the ban was “unnecessary.”

SB 458 was held up in House Rules committee until an amendment was created to remove the university ban for illegal aliens. The version that would have been voted on in the House would not have contained the post secondary education language. Leadership refused to move the bill with the college ban.

7) Who wanted and needed SB 458 to pass and lobbied extensively on Day 40 to get the bill out of the House and back to the Senate for a final OK? Believe it or not, because of the fixes for proof of US citizenship and birth certificates and the workload reduction SB 458 would have represented, in addition to countless pro-enforcement Georgians begging the Speakers office and House members, making calls and sending faxes and emails in favor of SB 458, very powerful entities were also heavily in favor. Including: The AG office, ACCG/GMA, SOS office, Ga. Dept. of Drivers Services, DOL, Ga . Insurance Commisioner’s office,the Georgia Chamber of Commerce…. But not the Agriculture industry. And as far as any one can see, not the Speaker or Governor Deal’s office.

CBS Atlanta 46

The GOP amnesty sell-out

Posted by D.A. King at 12:00 pm - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

Charles Martel — The American Thinker

The amnesty sell-out

If you want to know what open borders Republicans will sound like when they betray this nation’s sovereignty, take it from the horse’s mouth: Carlos Gutierrez, head of Mitt Romney’s Hispanic outreach, told CNN’s Candy Crowley, “[T]he far right of this party has taken the party to a place that it doesn’t belong.” — What Gutierrez is saying is very instructive: He is demonstrating that Republicans will have to…

HERE

NRO – Mark Steyn on tribal America

Posted by D.A. King at 11:56 am - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

Mark Steyn — National Review
“…take it from the New York Times. In 2009, Jason DeParle filed a story about suburban Maryland, in which he helpfully explained the municipality of Langley Park to Times readers: Now nearly two-thirds Latino and foreign-born, it has the aesthetics of suburban sprawl and the aura of Central America. Laundromats double as money-transfer stores. Jobless men drink and sleep in the sun. There is no city government, few community leaders, and little community. Golly. You’d almost get the impression that Mr. DeParle thinks that laundromats doubling as money-transfer stores, jobless men drinking and sleeping in the sun, and dysfunctional government are somehow characteristic of Central America. That sounds awfully judgmental for a Times man, no?…”

Tribal America

To an immigrant such as myself (not the undocumented kind, but documented up to the hilt, alas), one of the most striking features of election-night analysis was the lightly worn racial obsession. On Fox News, Democrat Kirsten Powers argued that Republicans needed to deal with the reality that America is becoming what she called a “brown country.” Her fellow Democrat Bob Beckel observed on several occasions that if…

HERE

November 18, 2012

RINO Gutierrez: English shouldn’t be government’s official language

Posted by D.A. King at 5:34 pm - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

Breitbart

RINO Gutierrez: English shouldn’t be government’s official language

Republican Carlos Gutierrez, the Secretary of Commerce for George W. Bush’s second term, said English should not be the official language of the U.S. government on Sunday. — Speaking on a panel on CNN’s “State of the Union,” Gutierrez said Republicans should lead on “comprehensive immigration reform” and the DREAM Act, while getting rid of “things like English as the official language of government.”…

HERE

NO TO AMNESTY-AGAIN! REMEMBER 1986! Don’t be fooled into open borders – FACTS and TALKING POINTS HERE! Be an educated American on the consequences of another legalization for illegal aliens!

Posted by D.A. King at 1:33 pm - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

Note: This page is under construction and information will be constantly added. We will also be posting a list of the GOP Georgia delegation and their responses to an upcoming questionaire regarding their own position on joining the Obama Democrats and some in the Republican party in a quest for another legalization program. We hope that you will check back soon and also see our facebook page.

Please be an educated voter and make your voice heard. Please contact both of Georgia’s U.S. Senators and your own GOP Congressman with your views on a repeat of the amensty for illegal aliens of 1986. Ask them how this ridiculous surrender would help honest Georgians find a job…and remember, there is another election in twenty-three months. Contact info HERE.

Facts and talking points for pro-enforcement Americans against another massive legalization plan for illegal aliens in the USA. Please share this with friends, family and fellow patriots.

Following the disastrous November 2012 defeat in the presidential election and regardless of past evidence and majority American opinion, many Republicans are now joining Barack Hussein Obama and the far-left Democrats in trying to force an amnesty for illegal aliens through congress. There will be no public-input hearings or committee meetings on the maneuver.

The liberal media , political pundits and $ean Hannity , along with too many in GOP leadership are going to try to convince you that a legalization plan would end illegal immigration, result in secure borders and would somehow increase the Republican voting rolls. The fact that it is the liberal press and the Democrats who are pushing hardest for this sham should be an indicator of the fantasy of newly legalized, mostly Hispanic, low-wage, entitlement-dependent aliens joining the small government, low tax, rule-of-law Republican party.

Apparently, panicked leaders in the GOP are attempting to prove “those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” Again.

Most illegal immigration comes from Latin America. “Hispanics” are not a monolithic voting bloc. But they do largely vote big-government Democrat. Rather than what’s best for the republic, far too many low-wage voters support the candidate that promises the most entitlements (loot ). Hispanics included. In any language, it is 20th century Democrat President John F. Kennedy’s “Ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country” in reverse.

What is the message to the patriotic, rule-of-law, conservative Hispanic-Americans — including those who are real, legal immigrants — who do support Republicans if the GOP surrenders to the ongoing extortion from Obama, some in the GOP and the illegal alien lobby?

Reliable evidence available on Hispanic public opinion makes it clear that generally, “Hispanics” are a fairly liberal voting group. Just 12 percent of Latinos polled supported a cuts-only approach to deficit reduction. Only 25 percent want to repeal Obamacare. Only 31 percent said they’d be more likely to vote for a Republican who supports the DREAM Act.

Memo to the GOP base: Hispanics do not reward Republicans with majority support on amnesty.

FACT: Amnesty, by any name, is not the answer. Attrition through Enforcement works

The reasonable and workable solution to America’s illegal immigration crisis is to secure our borders, as is required by the constitution, insure that all temporary visa holders leave the U.S. on time and as agreed in their visa process and to enforce all of our immigration, benefits and employment laws. It has taken more than thirty years for this nationally-suicidal nightmare to develop. There is no overnight fix. The fact is that illegal aliens flee areas in which the law is enforced. Please tell your elected officials at all levels: Attrition Through Enforcement works ! A steady, gradual attrition of the illegal population through enforcement of the law is the answer.

FACT: We already tried amnesty – in 1986. It only served to increase illegal immigration. It did NOT increase GOP voting by Hispanics
.

The first thing all Americans should know about legalizing the 12-20 million illegal aliens who are even now taking American jobs, benefit and services while they march in the streets of our nation demanding special treatment under the law is that “comprehensive immigration reform” is the 21st century code word for another amnesty and that this is not a new or un-tried idea. I was done in 1986 and only rewarded and increased illegal immigration .

In 1986 we were told by the GOP-led federal government, big business, big religion, the big ethnic lobby and the shameless liberal media that the illegal immigration problem would be solved forever, that our borders would be secured and illegal employment would end if we legalized about one million illegal aliens. The real result was that about three-million illegals eventually received amnesty. Remember that when the press constantly tells you that there are only “11 million” illegals here now.

Pro-amnesty GOP leaders should pay attention to 2012 election-day talking points distributed by Dr. Juan Andrade Jr. at the United States Hispanic Leadership Institute. He unintentionally illustrates the absurdity and folly of the latest position on “comprehensive immigration reform” from some congressional leaders. Andrade points out that in his run for re-election in 1984, Ronald Reagan promised legalization. And got 37 percent of the Hispanic vote.

In 1988, just two years after the GOP actually delivered the “one-time” amnesty, Republican presidential candidate George H.W. Bush lost the Latino vote by 39 points. Ever-pandering GOP Texan George W. Bush, who promised amnesty in his 2004 re-election campaign, got less than 40 percent of the Hispanic vote.

Republican John McCain got 31 percent of the Latino vote despite his desperate foreign-language radio campaign promise of amnesty “on day one” in 2008.

The record low was Bob Dole at 21 percent in 1996 against incumbent Bill Clinton, who had just implemented landmark, effective border enforcement with “Operation Gatekeeper ,” a massive project announced in 1994 “to restore integrity and safety to the nation’s busiest border” that secured the American/Mexican border in San Diego. An action that outraged the illegal alien lobby then and still does today.

Pro-enforcement Democrat Clinton won in a landslide. With 72 percent of the Hispanic vote.

Documenting millions of undocumented potential Democrats is a ridiculous approach to electing a conservative president or saving the remnants of the Republican Party.

FACT: Illegal aliens are not “immigrants”

Federal law defines “immigrant” as an alien (non-citizen) who enters the United States lawfully with the intention of permanent residence ( LPR, which is documented with a “Green Card”) – or an alien who is already here and has been granted LPR. An illegal alien, someone here in violation of our immigration laws is not any kind of an “immigrant.”

FACT: Border security is not a bargaining chip and nearly half the illegals now here did not come over the border illegally. They came lawfully, on temporary visas. There is no effective system in place to effectively monitor visa departures or overstays.

Your check is in the mail? To the endless promise from the usual suspects of “don’t worry, this time we are going to secure the border, no, really, before we initiate the legalization process”: It should also be noted that nearly half of the illegals currently demanding amnesty-again did not come over American borders illegally. They came on legal, temporary visas and refused to leave.

Do we continually offer amnesty to visa-overstayers too? Why not simply announce a scheduled future comprehensive pull-out for all of our immigration law enforcement?

FACT: The United States has nothing to apologize for on immigration.

Even now, with the years-old unemployment crisis, the USA takes in more (real, legal) immigrants than any nation in the world at more than one million each year. The traditional level of immigration is around 250,000 – 300,000 annually. If any apology is needed, it should be to the immigrants and citizens who are watching their jobs and rule of law be taken by illegal aliens and the people who employ them. Note: The U.S. also imports more than one million temporary guest workers each year.

FACT: The main cause of Illegal immigration is illegal employment.

While it is true that some non-citizens are here with the intention of doing us great harm, most illegal immigration is caused by the fact even as millions of their countrymen suffer from unemployment, integrity-free employers will hire black-market labor because illegals will work for less than an American or legal immigrant. It is all about the money, profit margins and “cheap labor.” The illegals come here because they can make more money than at home and the illegal employers hire thm for more profits.

FACT: There is no such thing as “cheap labor.”

The artificially low wages paid to illegal labor does not allow the illegals to afford to pay for the benefits and services that they consume. It is the American citizens – including those who are real, legal immigrants – who are watching as their taxes go top pay for illegals. Governor Nathan Deal has repeatedly said that Georgians pay around $2.4 billion each year for the cost of education, health care amd incarceration alone because of illegal aliens and their children.

FACT: Employment verification – E-Verify -deters illegal hiring, illegal immigration and saves JOBS!, JOBS!, JOBS! for American workers.

The no-cost (it’s free!) federal E-Verify employment verification system is a quick, easy to use, reliable and accurate method of insuring that newly-hired employees are eligible to work in the United States. E-Veroifyu is currently used by*** employers and about *** employers sign up every day month week***

FACT: Corporate America is as anti-enforcement as the radical ethnic lobby and is a powerful enemy of the American majority on immigration enforcement and amnesty.

It was the United States Chamber of Commerce that sued multiple times in federal court in an effort to prevent the federal government from requiring use of E-Verify for many federal contractors. It was also the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in concert with radical far-left groups that went all the way to the United States Supreme Court to stop implementation of Arizona’s 2007 E-Verify law.

FACT: There is no such thing as an “undocumented immigrant.”

The legal, proper and accurate name for those here in violation of American immigration laws is “illegal alien.” Illegal aliens possess a wide variety of “documents” including fraudulent and stolen IDs and identification from their home countries designed to make likle easier for them to reside illegally in the United States. While they send billions of dollars back

November 16, 2012

D.A. King in the Gwinnett Daily Post yesterday ( also, in the Cherokee Tribune yesterday)

Posted by D.A. King at 12:30 pm - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

D.A. King in the Gwinnett Daily Post yesterrday ( also, in the Cherokee Tribune yesterday)

Gwinnett Daily Post
November 15, 2012

KING: GOP wasting its time with amnesty outreach to Hispanic voters

According to a 2000 report from the then INS, the “one-time” Republican amnesty for illegal aliens in 1986 served to increase illegal immigration and illegal employment. And it clearly did not result in secure American borders.

The latest indication of intent from Republican leadership in Washington to join with Barack Obama in another amnesty for the 12 to 20 million illegal aliens currently taking jobs, benefits and services in the U.S. is being sold as a way to increase the Hispanic vote.

Apparently, panicked leaders in the GOP are attempting to prove “those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” Again.

“Hispanics” are not a monolithic voting bloc. But they do largely vote big-government Democrat. Rather than what’s best for the republic, far too many voters support the candidate that promises the most entitlements (loot), Hispanics included. In any language, it is 20th-century Democrat President John F. Kennedy’s “Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country” in reverse.

What is the message to the patriotic, rule-of-law, conservative Hispanic-Americans — including those who are real, legal immigrants — who do support Republicans if the GOP surrenders to the ongoing extortion from the illegal alien lobby?

Reliable evidence available on Hispanic public opinion from an election eve ImpreMedia/Media Decisions (slogan: “Everything Latino politics”) poll makes it clear that generally, “Hispanics” are a fairly liberal voting group. Just 12 percent of Latinos polled supported a cuts-only approach to deficit reduction. Only 25 percent want to repeal Obamacare. Only 31 percent said they’d be more likely to vote for a Republican who supports the DREAM Act.

Your check is in the mail? With regard to the endless promise from the usual suspects of “don’t worry, this time we are going to secure the border, no, really, before we initiate the legalization process,” it should also be noted that nearly half of the illegals currently demanding amnesty-again did not come over American borders illegally. They came on legal, temporary visas and refused to leave. Do we continually amnesty visa-overstayers too? Why not simply announce a scheduled future comprehensive pull-out for all of our immigration law enforcement?

Memo to the GOP base: Hispanics do not reward Republicans with majority support on amnesty.

Pro-amnesty GOP leaders should pay attention to 2012 election-day talking points distributed by Dr. Juan Andrade Jr. at the United States Hispanic Leadership Institute. He unintentionally illustrates the absurdity and folly of the latest position on “comprehensive immigration reform” from some congressional leaders. Andrade points out that in his run for re-election in 1984, Ronald Reagan promised legalization. And got 37 percent of the Hispanic vote.

In 1988, just two years after the GOP actually delivered the “one-time” amnesty, Republican presidential candidate George H.W. Bush lost the Latino vote by 39 points. No less than the ever-pandering GOP Texan George W. Bush, who promised amnesty in his 2004 re-election campaign, got less than 40 percent of the Hispanic vote.

Republican John McCain got 31 percent of the Latino vote despite his desperate foreign-language radio campaign promise of amnesty “on day one” in 2008.

The record low was Bob Dole at 21 percent in 1996 against incumbent Bill Clinton, who had just implemented landmark, effective border enforcement with “Operation Gatekeeper,” a massive project announced in 1994 “to restore integrity and safety to the nation’s busiest border” that secured the American/Mexican border in San Diego, an action that outraged the illegal alien lobby then and still does today.

Pro-enforcement Democrat Clinton won in a landslide. With 72 percent of the Hispanic vote.

Documenting millions of undocumented Democrats is a ridiculous approach to electing a conservative president or saving the remnants of the Republican Party.

Pro-enforcement voters of every ethnicity should be calling their representation in Washington, D.C. and asking what is really going on.

And offering a short history lesson on amnesty’s real payoff.

D.A. King is a nationally recognized authority on illegal immigration and president of the Georgia-based Dustin Inman Society, which is active in advocating a pro-enforcement policy on immigration and employment. HERE

November 14, 2012

D.A. King on Insider Advantage Georgia today: A few questions and a short lesson in history

Posted by D.A. King at 10:48 am - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

Insider Advantage GeorgiaTop Story

November 14, 2012

D.A. King: A Few Questions and a Short Lesson in History

Immigration history lessons and questions for the panicked GOP: Most Hispanics don’t vote for Republicans and a repeat of the 1986 amnesty for illegal aliens won’t change that reality. According to a 2000 report from the agency formerly known as the INS, the “one-time” Republican amnesty for illegal aliens in 1986 served to increase illegal immigration and illegal employment. And it clearly did not result in secure American borders.

The latest indication of intent from Republican leadership in Washington to join with President Barack Obama in another amnesty for the 12-20 million illegal aliens currently taking jobs, benefits and services in the U.S. is being sold as a way to increase the Hispanic vote.Apparently, panicked leaders in the GOP are attempting to prove “those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” Again.

“Hispanics” are not a monolithic voting bloc. But they do largely vote big-government Democrat. Rather than what’s best for the republic, far too many voters support the candidate that promises the most entitlements (loot). Hispanics included.In any language, it is 20th century Democrat President John F. Kennedy’s “think not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country” in reverse.

What is the message to the patriotic, rule-of-law, conservative Hispanic-Americans — including those who are real, legal immigrants — who do support Republicans if the GOP surrenders to the ongoing extortion from the illegal alien lobby?Reliable evidence available on Hispanic public opinion from an election eve ImpreMedia/Media Decisions (slogan:“Everything Latino politics”) poll makes it clear that generally, “Hispanics” are a fairly liberal voting group. Just 12 percent of Latinos polled supported a cuts-only approach to deficit reduction. Only 25 percent want to repeal Obama-care. Only 31 percent said they’d be more likely to vote for a Republican who supports the DREAM Act.

Your check is in the mail? To the endless promise from the usual suspects of “don’t worry, this time we are going to secure the border, no, really, before we initiate the legalization process.” It should also be noted that nearly half of the illegals currently demanding amnesty-again did not come over American borders illegally. They came on legal, temporary visas and refused to leave. Do we continually allow visa overstayers too? Why not simply announce a scheduled future comprehensive pullout for all of our immigration law enforcement?

Memo to the GOP base: Hispanics do not reward Republicans with majority support on amnesty. Pro-amnesty GOP leaders should pay attention to 2012 election-day talking points distributed by Dr. Juan Andrade Jr. at the United States Hispanic Leadership Institute. He unintentionally illustrates the absurdity and folly of the latest position on “comprehensive immigration reform” from some congressional leaders.Andrade points out that in his run for re-election in 1984, Ronald Reagan promised legalization. And got 37 percent of the Hispanic vote.

In 1988, just two years after the GOP actually delivered the “one-time” amnesty, Republican presidential candidate George H.W. Bush lost the Latino vote by 39 points.

No less than the ever-pandering GOP Texan George W. Bush, who promised amnesty in his 2004 re-election campaign, got less than 40 percent of the Hispanic vote.

Republican John McCain got 31 percent of the Latino vote despite his desperate foreign-language radio campaign promise of amnesty “on day one” in 2008.

The record low was Bob Dole at 21 percent in 1996 against incumbent Bill Clinton, who had just implemented landmark, effective border enforcement with “Operation Gatekeeper,” a massive project announced in 1994 “to restore integrity and safety to the nation’s busiest border” that secured the American/Mexican border in San Diego. An action that outraged the illegal alien lobby then and still does today.Pro-enforcement Democrat Clinton won in a landslide. With 72 percent of the Hispanic vote.

Documenting millions of undocumented Democrats is a ridiculous approach to electing a conservative president or saving the remnants of the Republican Party.Pro-enforcement voters of every ethnicity should be calling their representation in Washington, D.C., and asking what is really going on. And offering a short history lesson on amnesty’s real payoff.

D.A. King is a nationally recognized authority on illegal immigration and president of the Georgia-based Dustin Inman Society. He is not a member of any political party and can be reached at www.TheDustinInmanSociety.org.

Editors note: Mr. D.A. King, known for his long held positions on immigration, asked to give what he considers a different perspective than those expressed by others in recent InsiderAdvantageGeorgia post-election stories. We are happy to provide Mr. Kings views.

D.A. King in the Macon Telegraph today:KING: Outreach to Hispanic voters a waste of time for GOP

Posted by D.A. King at 10:34 am - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

NOTE- For the record: The headline is not my idea and my column clearly says that amensty will not produce an increase in Hisoanic votes for the GOP – it does not address “outreach.” dak

Macon Telegraph
Opinion

November 14, 2012

KING: Outreach to Hispanic voters a waste of time for GOP

By D.A. KING — Special to The Telegraph

Immigration history lessons and questions for the panicked GOP: Most Hispanics don’t vote for Republicans and a repeat of the 1986 amnesty for illegal aliens won’t change that realityAccording to a 2000 report from the agency formerly known as the INS, the “one-time” Republican amnesty for illegal aliens in 1986 served to increase illegal immigration and illegal employment. And it clearly did not result in secure American borders.

The latest indication of intent from Republican leadership in Washington to join with President Barack Obama in another amnesty for the 12-20 million illegal aliens currently taking jobs, benefits and services in the U.S. is being sold as a way to increase the Hispanic vote.Apparently, panicked leaders in the GOP are attempting to prove “those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” Again.

“Hispanics” are not a monolithic voting bloc. But they do largely vote big-government Democrat. Rather than what’s best for the republic, far too many voters support the candidate that promises the most entitlements (loot). Hispanics included.In any language, it is 20th century Democrat President John F. Kennedy’s “think not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country” in reverse.

What is the message to the patriotic, rule-of-law, conservative Hispanic-Americans — including those who are real, legal immigrants — who do support Republicans if the GOP surrenders to the ongoing extortion from the illegal alien lobby?Reliable evidence available on Hispanic public opinion from an election eve ImpreMedia/Media Decisions (slogan:“Everything Latino politics”) poll makes it clear that generally, “Hispanics” are a fairly liberal voting group. Just 12 percent of Latinos polled supported a cuts-only approach to deficit reduction. Only 25 percent want to repeal Obama-care. Only 31 percent said they’d be more likely to vote for a Republican who supports the DREAM Act.

Your check is in the mail? To the endless promise from the usual suspects of “don’t worry, this time we are going to secure the border, no, really, before we initiate the legalization process.” It should also be noted that nearly half of the illegals currently demanding amnesty-again did not come over American borders illegally. They came on legal, temporary visas and refused to leave. Do we continually allow visa overstayers too? Why not simply announce a scheduled future comprehensive pullout for all of our immigration law enforcement?

Memo to the GOP base: Hispanics do not reward Republicans with majority support on amnesty. Pro-amnesty GOP leaders should pay attention to 2012 election-day talking points distributed by Dr. Juan Andrade Jr. at the United States Hispanic Leadership Institute. He unintentionally illustrates the absurdity and folly of the latest position on “comprehensive immigration reform” from some congressional leaders.Andrade points out that in his run for re-election in 1984, Ronald Reagan promised legalization. And got 37 percent of the Hispanic vote.

In 1988, just two years after the GOP actually delivered the “one-time” amnesty, Republican presidential candidate George H.W. Bush lost the Latino vote by 39 points.

No less than the ever-pandering GOP Texan George W. Bush, who promised amnesty in his 2004 re-election campaign, got less than 40 percent of the Hispanic vote.

Republican John McCain got 31 percent of the Latino vote despite his desperate foreign-language radio campaign promise of amnesty “on day one” in 2008.

The record low was Bob Dole at 21 percent in 1996 against incumbent Bill Clinton, who had just implemented landmark, effective border enforcement with “Operation Gatekeeper,” a massive project announced in 1994 “to restore integrity and safety to the nation’s busiest border” that secured the American/Mexican border in San Diego. An action that outraged the illegal alien lobby then and still does today.Pro-enforcement Democrat Clinton won in a landslide. With 72 percent of the Hispanic vote.

Documenting millions of undocumented Democrats is a ridiculous approach to electing a conservative president or saving the remnants of the Republican Party.Pro-enforcement voters of every ethnicity should be calling their representation in Washington, D.C., and asking what is really going on. And offering a short history lesson on amnesty’s real payoff.

D.A. King is a nationally recognized authority on illegal immigration and president of the Georgia-based Dustin Inman Society. He is not a member of any political party and can be reached at www.TheDustinInmanSociety.org. Copyright 2012 . All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

HERE

November 13, 2012

Results of amnesty

Posted by D.A. King at 9:07 am - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

Do NOT click HERE to see the results of amnesty!

November 11, 2012

The truth about most Hispanics and voting for Republicans – it isn’t going to happen and a repeat of the 1986 amnesty for illegal aliens won’t change that fact

Posted by D.A. King at 9:35 pm - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

The truth about most Hispanics and voting for Republicans – it isn’t going to happen and a repeat of the 1986 amnesty for illegal aliens won’t change that fact

“Hispanics” are not a monolithic voting bloc. But they do mostly vote Democrat. Far too many voters support the candidate that promises the most entitlements (loot) . Hispanics included.

Nearly half of the illegal aliens present in the U.S. right now did not come here illegally. They overstayed temporary visas. For votes, should we ignore visa violations too? That is how many of the 9/11 terrorists were able to remain here.

Reliable evidence available on Hispanic public opinion from an election eve ImpreMedia/Media Decisions (slogan:“Everything Latino politics”) poll makes it clear that (unlike the proud Hispanics on the board of the Dustin Inman Society which this writer heads) generally, “Hispanics” are a fairly liberal voting group. Just 12 percent of Latinos polled supported a cuts-only approach to deficit reduction. Only 25 percent want to repeal Obamacare. Only 31 percent said they’d be more likely to vote for a Republican who supports the DREAM Act.

Memo to the GOP base: Hispanics do not reward Republicans with majority support on amnesty .

Using election-day talking points distributed by Dr. Juan Andrade Jr. at the United States Hispanic Leadership Institute, the folly of current “expert” advice is evident: In his run for re-election in 1984, Ronald Reagan promised legalization. And got 37% of the Hispanic vote.

In 1988, just two years after the GOP actually delivered amnesty, Republican presidential candidate George H.W. Bush lost the Latino vote by 39 points (Boston.com ). Even the super-Hispandering GOP Texan George W. Bush, who promised amnesty in his 2004 re-election campaign, got less than 40% of the Hispanic vote.

Republican John McCain got 31% of the Latino vote despite his foreign language radio promise of amnesty “on day one” in 2008.

The record low was Bob Dole at 21% in 1996 against incumbent Bill Clinton, who had just implemented landmark, meaningful enforcement with “Operation Gatekeeper ”, a massive project announced in 1994 “to restore integrity and safety to the nation’s busiest border” that secured the American/Mexican border in San Diego. Pro-enforcement Democrat Clinton won in a landslide with 72% of the Hispanic vote.

Documenting millions of resentful undocumented Democrats is a crack-pot approach to electing a Republican president.

Maybe too “red meat” an observation?

You can click HERE to see the evidence and links to the sources used above…

Next Page »