Whole-cloth fabrication from Karen, Zippy, and Bryan et al on E-Verify – the palpable desperation is clear. If they were going to make up a number – why not $127,000.00 per employee/query?
Just a wild guess – but I am thinking we won’t soon see an AJC “PolitiFact” inspection on this one.
. Whole-cloth fabrication from Karen, Zippy, and Bryan et al on E-Verify – the palpable desperation is clear. If they were going to make up a number – why not $127,000.00 per employee/query?
From the official DHS E-Verify Website:
“E-Verify is an Internet-based system that allows an employer, using information reported on an employee’s Form I-9, Employment Eligibility Verification, to determine the eligibility of that employee to work in the United States. For most employers, the use of E-Verify is voluntary and limited to determining the employment eligibility of new hires only. There is no charge to employers to use E-Verify. The E-Verify system is operated by the Department of Homeland Security in partnership with the Social Security Administration.”
The Georgia Restaurant Association has sent a letter to the legislature urging that they kill any enforcement bill and telling them that each E-Verify query to insure new employees are legal costs $127.00. They are using false information given to them by the Georgia Chamber of Commerce. They are all desperate.THE TRUTH IS E-VERIFY IS FREE TO USE AND COSTS ZERO TO VERIFY A WORKER. See the letter HERE See their reply to mail from pro-enforcement Americans HERE . They are solid amnesty-again proponents. Contact them if you want.
The Georgia agriculture industry sent a letter to the legislature this week telling them to kill any enforcement bill – ridding Georgia of illegal aliens and hiring real legal immigrants would be bad for the state they say. They are led by someone who many believe to possibly be unstable because of his conduct in the Capitol a man named Bryan Tolar. You can read the letter HERE • Note that they also use the bogus scare tactic that E-Verify somehow costs $127.000 per query. If they are making up a cost, why not use $127,000.000?