March 10, 2008

HAPPY DANCE HERE! Contractor gets 14 months for hiring illegal aliens

Posted by D.A. King at 11:30 pm - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

Contractor gets 14 months for hiring illegal immigrants

The Virginian-Pilot – Norfolk,VA,USA

By Tim McGlone
The Virginian-Pilot
© March 7, 2008
NORFOLK

A contractor who hired illegal immigrants to dig ditches for a Verizon Communications project was sentenced Friday to 14 months in prison.

Robert Buttery Sr., 53, of Fauquier County pleaded guilty to hiring, housing and transporting undocumented workers for his company, B&B Cable. He was caught after a state trooper stopped a van on Interstate 264 last summer and discovered 14 of his workers in the back.

B&B was hired by Ivy H. Smith Inc., a Greensboro, NC-based company that was a subcontractor for Fiber Technology Construction Inc., of Canton, Ga., …

“I’m just asking the court to put this in context,” Yates said, noting there are an estimated 20 million illegal immigrants working in the country.

“Depending on who gets elected, it may very well be legal to hire these people,” Yates continued. “John McCain doesn’t want to send them back. Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama don’t want to send them back.”

“My job is to follow the law,” Friedman interrupted, adding that he cannot be concerned with political matters.

Assistant U.S. Attorney James Metcalfe argued that Buttery could have faced a substantial amount of time in prison had the government decided to indict him on money laundering and tax evasion charges.

HERE

New word submited from the mail bag…

Posted by D.A. King at 11:18 pm - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

From a reader: New word submitted for illegal aliens… “CRIMIGRANT”
Makes sense to me.

We get mail from Americans

Posted by D.A. King at 11:15 pm - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

Comments:

Thank you so much for giving the people of Ga a method to fight this enemy.

D&B
Douglasville Ga.

The continuing saga of Gwinnett County and 287 (g) The Dustin Inman Society in the news

Posted by D.A. King at 2:36 pm - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

The below from the Gwinnett Daily Post Sunday from the Chairman of the Gwinnett Board of Commissioners.

If the headline chosen by the newspaper makes sense to you…kindly clue me in?

ICE funding must go through fitting review

By Charles Bannister
Board of Commissioners chairman

Editor’s note: Gwinnett County officials have been studying a federal program that would assist local law enforcement in deporting illegal immigrants who have been arrested.
Commission Chairman Charles Bannister today shares his thoughts on the issue.
Gwinnett County Sheriff Butch Conway was also offered the chance to write an editorial on 287(g). He declined but reiterated his comments that he wants to implement the program once he gets proper funding. “I want to do it, and I think we can do it with 18 (additional deputies),” he said previously.

I appreciate the opportunity that the Gwinnett Daily Post has given me to clarify the issues surrounding the Immigration Customs Enforcement (ICE) 287(g) program. I first want to assure Gwinnett County citizens that the Gwinnett County Commission will be moving forward quickly upon completion of the staff’s study and recommendations.

Several months ago, and on more than one occasion, I discussed with Sheriff Butch Conway the possibilities for 287(g) and the recommendations he had. He stated that the program was unnecessary since ICE assigned two agents to the jail to review the immigration status of inmates.

According to the sheriff, in 2007, his department successfully identified 360 inmates for ICE pickup.

After hearing that Cobb County Sheriff Neil Warren’s 287(g) had turned over close to 800 inmates to ICE in only six months, and after numerous comments at Board of Commissioners meetings in November and December 2007, as well as numerous citizen e-mails, it was my decision to move forward once again to ask the sheriff to initiate the 287(g) program. In mid-February, I announced my intention to propose a resolution at the Feb. 26 meeting urging the participation in 287(g) by the sheriff.

At about the same time, the sheriff began hearing more and more from citizens, organizations such as the Dustin Inman Society, and a Republican group in Gwinnett supporting 287(g), and he very recently decided that he no longer opposes participation in 287(g). However, he also announced that his support comes with a heavy price tag.

A large number of citizens were in attendance at the February BOC meeting to support the 287(g) program, and I want them to know that show of support was appreciated. By April, I hope to have all the details worked out with the sheriff so we can move forward as quickly as possible.

I want to be clear. The majority of the commission has no desire to postpone this issue. We simply have conflicting information to deal with regarding next steps and costs.

In conversations with the sheriffs of Cobb, Hall and Whitfield counties, I have been told that the 287(g) program did not create budget changes for operations or personnel. The 287(g) program is technically considered to be a tool used by those in the jail while doing their regular jobs.

In light of that information, it would be fiscally irresponsible for the Board and me to simply accept the Sheriff’s unsubstantiated statements that he must have an additional $3 million and 18 additional deputies without further investigation into the real costs to be incurred.

I am not in favor of just throwing millions of taxpayer dollars to the sheriff without asking questions. The sheriff’s budget already has ballooned at a far greater rate than any other department within Gwinnett County.

For example, in just five years, the sheriff’s budget has more than doubled from $29.09 million in 2002 to $62.14 million in 2007. Additionally, in 2000, the sheriff’s budget was 8.83 percent of the total budget, and today it is 14.26 percent. While some growth may be necessary, given changing times, there is simply no justification for having the inmate cost per day balloon from $34 a day in 2000 to more than $56 a day in 2008.

Too often, the government solution is simply more money and more people. The sheriff is a prime example of this. Total positions authorized by the current members of the Board of Commissioners have increased from 429 to more than 700 in just four years, while overtime has more than doubled in the department to more than $4.7 million in 2007.

There are questions to be asked. Whether Gwinnett joins the ICE 287(g) program is not one of them.

Now that the sheriff as well as my fellow commissioners have joined me in supporting 287(g), we must get the answers to these questions and get with the program.

Charles Bannister is chairman of the Gwinnett County Board of Commissioners.

HERE

March 9, 2008

FAST FACT: Gwinnett County, Georgia issued 3,379 citations for driving without a license in 2005 – add another 1000 for 2006!

Posted by D.A. King at 10:59 pm - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

Added 10 March @ 2:24: My apologies: After rereading the news article I cite here, I see that for 2007 Gwinnett County issued tickets to MORE THAN 5100 dirvers who had never obtained a Georgia driver’s license. The huge majority of these people are illegal aliens who consider our laws an optional suggestion if those laws do not directly benefit them ( consider free health care and education in a language other than English).

Most drivers who are caught that have never obtained a driver’s license are arrested and booked into jail.

Where, if Gwinnett had 287 (g) authority – like we do in Cobb County -, the illegals would be identified and ICE would be notified.

Hmm…
“According to traffic records, the Gwinnett County Police Department issued 3,379 citations for driving without a license in 2005. That’s roughly nine citations per day. “

The following year, the department dished out nearly 1,000 more citations, edging the average to 12 busts per day.

Last year, the daily average of no-license drivers bumped to 14. Officials could not easily dice the data to illustrate where in Gwinnett the busts happened.

Gwinnett Daily Post
March 9, 2008

HERE

March 8, 2008

My letter published in the Georgia Trand magazine in response to an article on Cobb County, my home for 25 years. – and one from Gerardo ( Jerry) E. Gonzalez of GALEO

Posted by D.A. King at 8:34 pm - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

In resonse to:Cobb County: Rebuilding Cobb Suburban outposts move to reclaim the city center January, 2008

link to magazine

Cobb County views

As a twenty-five year resident, I enjoyed reading your informative article [January 2008] on our changing and efficiently run county.

Most of us paying attention here are very proud of Cobb’s developing – and redeveloping – “new urban” areas. We are also very proud of the elected and appointed officials who strive to keep our government working to control our growth and to protect and serve the entire population.

When considering the safety, security – and fair employment markets – of future employees, potential investors in boardrooms all over the world should consider as a positive quality the high level of professionalism on the part of law-enforcement officials in Cobb County.

They wisely use all available federal and state tools to control crime of all descriptions in our very welcoming area.

Cobb is family and business friendly thanks to the equal application of the rule of law, sound planning and a community that welcomes all who desire to work hard lawfully and fairly.

D.A. King

The writer is president of the Dustin Inman Society, which opposes illegal immigration.


Here is one published from Jerry Gonzalez in the same issue on the same article:

Before Cobb County attempts to paint itself as a welcoming destination for international investment, the county must address some ( concerns ) Cobb County Commissioners passed an anti-family and anti-immigrant housing ordinance directly targeting Latino and immigrant families. As a result of these intimidation tactics, many immigrant families are leaving Cobb County.

As Americans, we must remember that the rule of law and our U.S. Constitution provides basic protections to all people. Regardless of what we may feel about the failed federal immigration policy, the rule of law includes protections of due process for ALL people, regardless of immigration status or citizenship. This was recently upheld by a federal court against the City of Hazelton. (It) should also be applied in a manner that does not discriminate against any group.

Jerry Gonzalez

The writer is executive director of the Georgia Association of Latino Elected Officials

To get just a glimmer of why not too many people take Jerry seriously ( except it seems, Georgia Trend), click below to see the letter he actually sent. He posted it on his Website twice. By my count using WORD the editors at Georgia Trend had to edit 396 words out of Jerry’s angry and hateful tirade to find something fit to print.

Jerry is a constant source of amusement! CLICK HERE TO SEE HIS ORIGINAL LETTER.

I forgot to post my letter published in the AJC Friday: Immigration: Both parties cave on this vital issue

Posted by D.A. King at 8:14 pm - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

READERS WRITE AJC letters to the editor

For the Journal-Constitution

Published on: 03/07/08

Immigration: Both parties cave on this vital issue

The gleeful open-borders/amnesty coalition of big business, big religion and the radical far left ethnic lobby is virtually assured of another legalization proposal for illegal aliens – and their employers – from Hillary Clinton, John McCain, Teddy Kennedy and Barack Obama.

We have only to wait until November to see who will be president.

There should be no doubt about the priority of repeating the failed amnesty of 1986. The GOP management is willing to commit political suicide by putting more than 20 million mostly future Democratic voters on a path to citizenship —- on orders from their corporate bosses. Follow the money.

The Republicans have begun a game of chicken with their base. The Dems will be the political benefactors
( note from D.A. – I meant “beneficiaries”…my fault) and the American people will fight and defeat the coming amnesty attempt. Again.

On border security and illegal immigration, it really doesn’t matter who is elected president.

Game on!

D.A. KING

King, of Marietta, is president of the Dustin Inman Society, which is actively opposed to illegal immigration.

From the way-back machine: Mexican Matricula consular ID – FEEL SAFER?

Posted by D.A. King at 3:47 pm - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

Below is a 2005 newspaper column I wrote to educate people on the Mexican government’s effort to provide photo ID to illegal aliens in the U.S. Who is the open borders/illegal alien lobby? Never overlook the banking industry.

I have added some additional information in the embedded links to further educate the reader.

Mexican matricula consular ID documenting illegal aliens

By D.A. King
Marietta Daily Journal
September 23, 2005

What is green and red, includes a photograph, is needed only by illegal aliens and is issued here in the United States – by a foreign government?

No idea? A hint – it’s a photo ID card.

More clues.

What is printed in Spanish, is deemed to be a “criminal threat” and a “potential terror threat” to this country by the FBI Office of Intelligence – but is accepted by many American banks, hospitals and local and state governments?

More?

What has been labeled as an “un-reliable form of identification” by the Department of Justice, but can be used to board an airplane in America – during a war on terror?

Give up?

Answer: A Mexican matricula consular photo identification card. Don’t feel bad if you didn’t know the answer – most Americans haven’t a clue what a matricula consular is either. That is not an accident.

A brief history and some insight into the little-known matricula consular:

On Aug. 29, 2001, in a speech to both Houses of the U.S. Congress, President Vicente Fox of Mexico said the Mexicans who were here illegally at the time were “entitled to legalized status” and later demanded that President Bush “solve the problem before the year ends.”

Even before the horror of 9/11, public opinion worked against the impending amnesty – er – “guest-worker” proposal for the millions of illegal aliens already here.

Following 9/11 and because of the resulting now obvious Homeland Security issues, the plan to repeat the “one-time amnesty” of 1986 and “legalize” the millions of illegal aliens in the U.S. was taken off the table. Several other things however, did not change.

Here, the unrelenting demand from “willing employers” for taxpayer-subsidized labor continued – as did the craving of American banks for the highly profitable business of the enormous illegal alien market.

In Mexico, the demand for the billions of U. S. dollars sent home by the “migrants” – “remittances” (more than $16 billion last year, an estimated $20 billion this year) – also remained unchanged.

Remittances are now the single largest source of revenue for Mexico – larger than Pemex, the state-owned oil company, and foreign investment and tourism. Real, legal immigrants who have entered the United States according to American law have a valid visa, a passport – and access to a little detail called “Lawful Permanent Residency” (a “Green Card”.) All serve as valid identification.

Illegal aliens have none of these.

Shortly after 9/11, Mexico began what Marti Dinerstein of The Center for Immigration Studies describes as an “aggressive grassroots lobbying campaign to win acceptance for the matricula consular at the local and state level, especially in areas where large numbers of Mexicans resided.”

Like Georgia. The city of Atlanta began official acceptance last year.

The Mexican government, American business and the powerful open borders – illegal alien lobby (sorry, I repeat myself) is quick to point out that possession of the matricula consular does not reflect immigration status.

Indeed.

Make no mistake, issuing – and accepting – the matricula consular encourages and accommodates illegal immigration. Illegal immigration has actually increased since 9/11/2001.

Feel safer?

The campaign has been wildly successful – and profitable. According to the Mexico City newspaper El Universal, as of January of this year, 4.5 million Mexicans had these ID cards and they are accepted in 386 cities, 164 counties and 338 financial institutions in our republic.

What should logically represent probable cause instead becomes instant documentation and “stealth amnesty” for the previously “undocumented migrants.”

Mexico’s stated goal is to have issued 6 million matriculas by the end of this year.

Because of its ease of forgery and the lack of security – not to mention fingerprinting – involved in issuing the Mexican ID, it is not accepted by most banks in Mexico and may not be used to obtain the federally issued Mexican voter ID – or state issued Mexican driver’s licenses.

American police report that it is not uncommon to come across people in possession of multiple matricula consulars – all with different names.

Blockbuster Video does not accept the matricula consular to open an account to rent a DVD.

Ten states in the U.S. accept the matricula as valid ID to issue an American driver’s license, thereby eliminating the need for the matricula.

Handy, si?

How hard to get is the Mexican matricula consular? Ask to see one of mine.
Why is it accepted in the United States?

Follow the money.

HERE.

FAST FACT: the average low skill immigrant household received $14,145 in benefits and services and paid only $5,309 in taxes

Posted by D.A. King at 3:31 pm - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

The Heritage Foundation

The average low skill immigrant household received $14,145 in benefits and services and paid only $5,309 in taxes…The average low skill immigrant households imposed a net fiscal burden on state and local government of $8,836 per year. Current federal immigration policy permits a massive inflow of both legal and illegal low skill immigrants to enter and reside in the U.S. This imposes a massive unfunded mandate on state and local government which much bear the costs of that immigration flow. HERE.

Washington is acknowledging the high cost of illegal immigration

Posted by D.A. King at 3:29 pm - Email the author   Print This Post Print This Post  

Heritage Foundation

Illegal immigration costs demonstrated again

Slowly but surely Washington is acknowledging the high cost illegal immigration inflicts on local governments. Today the New York Times reports on a study by the University of Arizona and San Diego State University showing counties along the Mexican border spent $1.23 billion processing illegal immigrants through their justice systems between 1999 and 2006.

HERE.

« Previous PageNext Page »