Not enough Americans are asking “WHY” President Bush refuses to secure American borders in a war on terror.

Residents of planned union
to be ‘North Americanists’
Arizona State University teaches
how continent to be integrated

January 5, 2007
By Bob Unruh
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

Arizona State University is teaching that the U.S., Mexico and Canada need to be integrated into a unified superstate, where U.S. citizens of the future will be known as “North Americanists,” according to the taxpayer-funded “Building North America” program.

The program openly advocates for the integration of economic issues across the continent, and in many places goes further – such as the call for a common North American currency.

One teaching module made available online for professors to integrate into their teachings was written by George Haynal, senior fellow at the Norman Patterson School of International Affairs at Carleton University, and implied a joint military is required. Since the security of the continent “is a joint need; it should be supplied as a common enterprise.”

“Given the nature of the threats against our security in the current environment, the first task is to reinvent ‘borders.’ We must exercise the responsibility for protecting our society against external threats where we can do so most effectively, not where infrastructures happens to be in place,” he added. “Multilateral cooperation is going to be essential among governments.”

“It is clear, to me at least, that we must … move beyond NAFTA and do so with a purposeful determination,” he wrote.

Another teaching paper advocates the adoption of a unified North American currency, the “amero,” modeled after the euro currency of the European Union.

The programming the university is providing for help in teaching the new North American focus is just the latest evidence of the mounting campaign for a de facto North American Union. Although most in the establishment press are not covering the controversy, it has earned the opposition of a number of high-level voices including congressmen like Tom Tancredo, Virgil Goode and Ron Paul, and newsmen like CNN’s Lou Dobbs who has described the U.S. government’s actions in this effort as “Orwellian.”

The rest here.

More? Try this:

The ultimate goal of any White House policy ought to be a North American economic and political alliance similar in scope and ambition to the European Union,” opined an Atlanta Journal-Constitution editorial on September 7, 2001. “Unlike the varied landscapes and cultures of European Union members, the United States, Canada and Mexico already share a great deal in common, and language is not as great a barrier. President Bush, for example, is quite comfortable with the blended Mexican-Anglo culture forged in the border states of Texas, California and Arizona.”

La Times editorial on ‘Why not open the borders” here

D.A.’s June 2006 AJC column here.

The below news story is true, and at the bottom I provide links to verify it in several other places, but you won’t hear about it in the MainStream Media here in Georgia much, so I am sending it today.

Knowledge is power. Silence is consent.

We should all be asking why American National Guard troops are not armed, not protected and are ordered to run from armed Mexicans who are allowed to enter the what remains of our Republic.

Armed Mexicans Attack Unarmed National Guard Troops on US Soil

By Jim Kouri

Saturday, January 6, 2007

In a story that should have rang alarm bells in every newsroom across the nation, armed Mexican entered the United States and attacked unarmed National Guard troops working at a border patrol post near the US-Mexican border. The troops had to retreat to safety.

Not surprisingly, the news story received scant coverage by the mainstream news media and hardly a mention on the Fox News Channel. It’s a story that should outrage all Americans including President George W. Bush.

Unfortunately, President Bush and his Administration did not even comment on this vicious attack on unarmed US troops as well as the unbridled assault on American sovereignty. During a press conference held on Friday afternoon by Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff, there was not one word about this unprovoked attack on soldiers.

According to syndicated columnist and journalist Sher Zieve, the attack was initiated by several Mexican nationals at about 1:00 AM (et) Thursday morning at one of the National Guard entrance identification team posts near Sasabe. The troops retreated to safety. According to KVOA TV News reports in Tucson, AZ, no shots were fired and no one suffered injuries.

The US Border Patrol is conducting an investigation into the attack. Investigators are attempting to determine who the armed men were, what they were doing and why they approached the post before returning to Mexico.

A Border Patrol agent, who requested anonymity, says that the well-armed intruders were drug traffickers who are fully aware US National Guard troops are prohibited from carrying any type of weapon and have been ordered not to confront lawbreakers coming across the border. The Guard troops are not allowed to apprehend illegal entrants, as well.

“Basically, the National Guard troops are doing what private groups such as the Minuteman Project have done at US borders — observe and report,” said a Homeland Security Department official.

What he failed to mention is that the Minutemen didn’t cost taxpayers millions of dollars to just stand at the border unarmed and act as the eyes and ears of the already stretched-thin Border patrol agents.

Read the rest here from the Canada Free Press

Read it here from Arizona [ video available ]

Guardsmen overrun at the Border

AZCentral.com

National Guard unit stormed while patroling the border
Border attack raises security concerns

A U.S. Border Patrol entry Identification Team site was overrun Wednesday night along Arizona’s border with Mexico.

According to the Border Patrol, an unknown number of gunmen attacked the site in the state’s West Desert Region around 11 p.m. The site is manned by National Guardsmen. Those guardsmen were forced to retreat. The rest here

—————————

ATTENTION ILLEGAL ALIENS! 10% off on legal services if Congress grants the Bush path to citizenship-again Guest worker amnesty! Pre-file now for discount!

Call now! Lawyers standing by!

These immigration lawyers may need a new pair of shoes! Bring the entire family!

Dedicated – discounted to the bone – professional help with getting your path to citizenship long before the real immigrants will! Hurry! These rates won’t last!

Borders and immigration laws are for suckers! Call this law firm now for the help they desperatly want to sell!

Contact Hernan Taylor and Lee abogados…umm…lawyers to pre-register here!

Photos of lawyers and staff here! They speak your language!

But wait…there is more!

This law firm will arrange to take you to Washington to lobby for an end to those pesky American law enforcement efforts!

Money is no object! [ Well, until and unless the amnesty-again goes through…then, they want your money]. Bring the whole family!

PAY NO ATTENTION TO THE RECENT REPORTS THAT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT LACKS THE ABILITY TO VERIFY YOUR APPLICATION TO GET AMNESTY-AGAIN!

Immigrant Processors Fall Behind
System Overwhelmed Even Without ‘Amnesty,’ Guest Workers

By Spencer S. Hsu
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, January 4, 2007; Page A03

As the White House and Congress prepare to overhaul the nation’s immigration laws, U.S. officials have concluded that they lack the technology and resources to handle the millions of applications for legal residency that could result from the changes and that several efforts to modernize computers have gone astray.

Immigration officials have said for years that it is critical to update an antiquated, paper-based application process before the government grants a new path to citizenship for as many as 12 million illegal immigrants living in the United States or creates a temporary-worker program, as senators and the Bush administration propose.

But in recent months, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) officials have determined that the troubled, $2-billion-a-year agency is unable to effectively manage its existing work, much less a flood of new applications.

A report released Dec. 20 by Homeland Security Inspector General Richard L. Skinner cited a long list of setbacks and concurred with internal USCIS reviews that the bureau “lacks the processing capacity, systems integration and project management resources needed to manage a potential increase in workloads.”

A project to replace the nationwide computer network has been halted because the agency lacks $72 million to complete it. A staff reorganization was frozen because of deficiencies “that hinder day-to-day IT operations,” according to the report.

USCIS is in the midst of its third major modernization effort in three years, leaving some employees confused over whether such efforts were completed or were ever begun, the report said.

Many legal immigrants already face years-long waits when they apply for green cards, often a first step toward obtaining citizenship.Another 100,000 names submitted to the FBI for background checks have been on hold for a year or more. Congressional auditors recently reported that 14 immigration offices had lost track of 111,000 files as of July.

[The rest of the story here]

Let the lawyers do the worrying…and the lobbying! BUT BRING YOUR CHECKBOOK/LAST YEAR’S DAY-LABOR CASH!

Note from D.A.

Yuck.

Dual Citizenship – Many people have obtained American citizenship…but are also Mexican citizens.

We don’t think they love America.

A hint.

Another one.

For the mystery – loving readers, this information will become important soon.

Last hint…

The below excerpt courtesy of The Social Contract Press Winter 2002/2003

Undue Influence
The government of Mexico and U.S.
immigration policies

Allan Wall is an American citizen who lives in
Mexico. Many of his articles and columns are
at www.FRONTPAGEMAG.com

Dual Citizenship
By Allan Wall

Dual citizenship is another aspect of today’s immigration assimilation situation that the American political class prefers not to deal with. There are already millions of U.S. citizens who are also citizens of other nations. In the case of Mexico, dual citizenship has the potential to become a major problem.

The number of those already eligible numbers in the millions, dual citizenship is easy to achieve, the Mexican government now encourages it, and the U.S. government has no objections.

The State Department certainly is not concerned about dual citizenship: “Under U.S. Department of State
policy, being a national of another country is not, in and of its elf, an expatriating act.” In the oath of allegiance, however, a new American citizen states: “I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state or sovereignty, to whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen…”

The clear terms of the naturalization oath argue that U.S. citizenship, whatever today’s State Department might say, is not meant to be shared with that of another nation.

A “rank absurdity” is what Theodore Roosevelt called “dual citizenship,” which, beside its enormous potential for conflicts of interest, is incompatible with the concept of equal justice under the law.

Until quite recently, Mexico felt the same way, rejecting out of hand the concept of dual nationality. As
part of the sea change which took place during the Zedillo administration, however, a move to change the
law was made in 1997 (taking effect in 1998). Articles 30, 32, and 37 of the Mexican Constitution were
amended to make dual nationality possible, so that now a Mexican emigrant would not lose his Mexican citizenship even if he became an American citizen.

Certainly dual citizenship existed before this constitutional change. There have been double citizens of
the United States and Mexico for some time. One reason is the desirability of U.S. citizenship as a means to an
end, and Mexican families have been known to take their pregnant women to the U.S. to give birth, so that under the current interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment the child would be an American citizen.

Nevertheless, dual citizenship was still not recognized by the Mexican government until the amendments of 1997. The intention of the amendments was, according to the Mexican Department of Legislative
Documentation, to prevent Mexicans living in the United States from losing their Mexican nationality if they
became American citizens, so that “those who opt for a non-Mexican nationality can fully express their rights in their place of residence…”

After the new law took effect, one of those who announced his attention to apply was Oscar de la Hoya
(The Siglo, October 20, 1999), American boxer, born in the U.S. of Mexican ancestry.

In de la Hoya’s statement explaining why he desired to be a citizen of Mexico, the reader can detect the strange ambivalence that would inspire a successful and wealthy American to adopt a foreign nationality:
I have always said, I am proud of my Mexican blood and although I was born in East LA, my
family is from Mexico and it would be an honor to be considered Mexican because I
have grown up and I have felt like a Mexican in every way. To be a Mexican citizen is
something I have always wanted to be. I respect this country a lot because it gave me
many opportunities, but the people who support me are Mexican…
(The boxer’s bus is emblazoned with both a Mexican and an American flag.)

At the time of the amendments, a distinction was made by some apologists between Mexican “nationality”
and Mexican “citizenship.” The argument was that an American citizen could obtain Mexican nationality and
not Mexican citizenship, and that the former does not give the indiviudal the right to vote in Mexico.

This explanation may be reassuring to some, but is of little value. The real distinction between Mexican
nationality and citizenship is that citizenship constitutionally refers to those of Mexican nationality
who have arrived at the age of 18 and are in full exercise of their rights as Mexicans, of which voting is the prime example. (Mexican Constitution, Articles 34, 35, and 36).

The plain fact is that there is nothing in either Mexican law or American law that can prevent dual
citizens from voting in both countries. According to the U.S. Embassy in Mexico, “Mexican citizens living in
Mexico who are also dual nationals enjoy the same voting rights as other Mexicans.” An article in Mexico’s Universal stated that one of the advantages of double nationality was “to exercise the right to the vote.”

Already there has been some dual voting by dual citizens who have voted in both countries, but it’s not yet
a widespread phenomenon. It could become one though if Mexican electoral law is changed; there are proposals to amend Mexican election law enabling millions of Mexicans living in the United States to vote.
According to one calculation, if the law were amended today, there would already be eleven million
individuals currently residing in the U.S. automatically eligible to vote in Mexican elections. This figure of eleven million of necessity includes some who are also American citizens. (see Conapo population figures,
above).

An attendant proposal for Mexicans in the U.S. to vote is to designate electoral districts in the United
States. California, for example, might have seats in the Mexican Congress, specifically representing Mexicans
(including Mexican-Americans ) residing in the state of California.

From NumbersUSA.com Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) was interviewed by NPR on Thursday (1/4/07). In his conversation, Sen. McConnell went out of his way several times to talk about how important it is to pass “comprehensive” immigration legislation and to pass the President’s immigration proposal. He indicated that he believes this is one issue on which Democrats and Republicans can work together with the President and immediately pass a “comprehensive” immigration reform bill. Sen. McConnell went on to add that he is disappointed that the Democrats didn’t make passing a “comprehensive” immigration bill one of their top priorirites to pass in first 100 hours.

DC Office of Senator Mitch McConnell
Washington, DC

202-224-2541

OR

Paducah Office of Sen. Mitch McConnell
Paducah, KY

270-442-4554

Phone to Sen. McConnell to express horror that one of his first acts as head of the Senate Republicans was to speak out in favor of mass importation of foreign workers. Remind Sen. McConnell that his support of a massive guestworker-amnesty program may doom the Republican Party to permanent minority status.

DC Office of Senator Mitch McConnell
Washington, DC
202-224-2541
Paducah Office of Sen. Mitch McConnell
Paducah, KY
270-442-4554

PLEASE take one minute of your time to make a $1.50 [?] phone call like I just did and let the Republican leader of the U.S. Senate Republicans get the clear message that “Guest worker plans” and Comprehensive Immigration Reform” is fooling no one, they are merely code terms for a repeat of the proven failure of amnesty and a path to citizenship that we tried in 1986.

This is what it is all about folks, a lot of people making small, quick and easy efforts to get the message to Washington. PLEASE take the time and do not assume that “someone else will take care of it”.

Elected oficials pay close attention to these calls, and the illegal alien lobby will be generating a lot of calls demanding amnesty agian, it is important that McConnel hears from real Americans!

I just called McConnell’s Washington Office…the young lady on the other end of the phone was very busy answering similar calls.

Politiely give the office your name and location and ask that she pass on your message to the Senator.

YOUR POLITE AND SHORT MESSAGE:

Americans understand the code words the Senator is using are merely code words for another amnesty, and that a repeat of the path to citizenship of 1986 is counter to the will of the majority of American citizens. It will do nothing to stop illegal immigration. If you are a Republican, remind Sen. McConnell that his support of a massive guestworker-amnesty program may doom the Republican Party to permanent minority status.

Your ending comment: The senator should be demanding that American borders be secured and our immigration and employment laws enforced.

Please take the time. While it is on your mind, please go to www.NumbersUSA.com and sign up for alerts like these along with their FREE fax from your computer service to Washington. [ I do, and got this alert from Roy Beck at NumbersUSA]

Social Security billions could go to Mexicans
Critics say benefits would lure illegals to U.S. while giving employers marginal help
January 2, 2007
© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com

An organization of retirees has announced the release, after three years of arguments and a Freedom of Information request, by the Social Security Administration of a copy of the first known public copy of the U.S.-Mexico Social Security Totalization Agreement.

The TREA Senior Citizens League said the document reveals what was expected, a huge threat to the future of Social Security, because any Mexican worker who has as little as 18 months of employment history in the United States could end up qualifying for some Social Security retirement benefits.

“The Social Security Administration itself warns that Social Security is within decades of bankruptcy – yet, they seem to have no problem making agreements that hasten its demise,” said Ralph McCutchen, chairman of the league.

For example, a worker who turns 62 after 1990 generally needs 40 calendar quarters of coverage to receive retirement benefits. Under the cross-country agreements, workers can combine earnings from both countries in order to qualify for benefits in the U.S.

The goal here people is to combine and integrate infrastructure, security and ultimately the economies of the nations of North America.

Think: North American Union. Sound crazy? Take a look at the EU – and the Euro.

First, Totalization [ combining the Social Security systems of Mexico and the United States], then another amnesty to make the 20-30 million illegals – most of whom are from Mexico – “legal” effectively making the concept of borders and any future enforcement moot.

Honest. You can read more about it here.

Read the rest of the World Net Daily report here – and please call your Representatives in Washington and get their promise to vote NO on any combination of Social Security systems.

More on the coming effort to grant Social Security benefits to illegal aliens from Mexico here.

More on the borderless continent here.

From the “yeah, sure lets give them a path to citizenship” department:

Gwinnett Daily Post:

Court pleads for help with illegals
12/15/2006

By Camie Young
Senior Writer
camie.young@gwinnettdailypost.com

LAWRENCEVILLE – Estimating up to 20 to 25 percent of their cases involve illegal immigrants, Gwinnett judges made a plea to state legislators to address the problem the only way they can – by adding another judge to the bench.

Not only has Gwinnett’s astronomical population growth caused a larger burden on Gwinnett’s judicial system, but the large number of non-English speakers means cases take longer, Superior Court Judge Melodie Snell Conner said in a presentation to lawmakers Thursday.

A 15-minute plea hearing takes twice the time when interpreters are involved, and criminal cases where the victim and the perpetrator speak different languages can make a trial very lengthy, she said.

Prompted by a question from a legislator, she said between 20 to 25 percent of the cases involve illegal immigrants who could face deportation.

But Conner said she once convicted an illegal immigrant of a felony only to have him appear in her court two years later for a probation violation.
Other State and Superior Court judges agreed with the percentage.
“Every calender I deal with has someone on it that’s illegal,” said Superior Court Judge Tom Davis.

Ahh…the rich blessing of illegals and their culture of family values.

Read the entire article here.

Below is today’s Marietta Daily Journal column. I have added some hyperlinks to educate the reader.

New amnesty push likely in 07 by Bush, Dems

D.A. King
Columnist

Five years into the war on terror, most Americans desperately hoped that 2006 would be “the year” for solutions to the our national nightmare of intentionally unsecured borders and the resulting illegal immigration crisis.

For many of us, the dream was that at the minimum, Americans could look forward to the American president and federal government to begin an effort at protection on border security and immigration law enforcement similar to what the Mexican citizens still living in Mexico enjoy.

It didn’t happen.

According to a report released in late 2006 by the House Committee on Homeland Security as many as 4-10 million people crossed into the United States illegally and un-inspected last year. Georgia watched as its population of illegal aliens increased by 114%…the highest rate of growth in the nation.

Now, 2007 is being touted as “the year”. The word in Washington and corporate boardrooms all over the country is that “comprehensive reform” – a repeat of the 1986 “one-time” path to citizenship for illegal aliens who come mostly from Mexico – must happen before official campaigning begins for the 2008 elections.

Happy New Year.

It seems that the party taking power in Congress is more in line with the president’s ideas on how to treat the resentful illegals and the vast black market labor- addicted employers.

Even as it became clear on election night in November that the Democrats were taking over the House, Tony Snow, the White House Press Secretary, remarked that the election results presented “interesting opportunities” for “comprehensive immigration reform”.

For something that the “do-nothing” Congress accomplished, I point to stopping the McCain/Kennedy/Bush amnesty of 2006. To the GOP House: Gracias.

The solution to the illegal immigration problem coming from Washington can be boiled down to this: Make everybody “legal”. Give them – again – the path to citizenship they demand, and whatever you do, don’t mention the “A” word. The present voters are on to the amnesty swindle, but hold on, we have millions of potential new voters right in front of us!

Happy New Year.

For those paying close attention, a return to the rule of law in 2006 never really looked good. “They might be unlawful aliens but otherwise lawful citizens” was how U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales described the millions of identity and wage stealing illegal aliens in remarks during his Senate confirmation hearings in January.

Happy New Year.

Having happily endorsed the re-writing and translating of the American national anthem in the spring of 2006, millions of screaming illegals marched in the streets of America waving the flag of Mexico in a demand for “dignity“ “justice” and amnestia for all.

In Chicago, about 75,000 marching illegals were led by U.S. Congressman Luis Gutierrez. “This is our country and we are not leaving!” was Gutierrez’s’ rallying cry.

Gutierrez is busy right now helping to write the House version of “comprehensive immigration reform”.
Happy New Year.

Imagine the headlines of “intolerance and racism” if Americans were to march by the millions in a demand for secure borders and an equal application of the law which requires that the illegals be punished along with their employers.

In an effort at preserving the common language of our grandfathers, implementation of English as official language laws across the nation were angrily opposed and ridiculed as “racist” by – among many others – U.S. Senator Harry Reid.

Does anyone remember the outraged headlines of 1999 when El Cenizo, Texas not only resolved to grant safe haven to all illegal aliens from Mexico, but made Spanish the town’s official language? Me neither.

Harry Reid is the incoming Senate Majority Leader.

Happy New Year.

Here in Georgia, taking time out from lobbying against passage of the Georgia Security and Immigration Compliance Act, Jerry Gonzales, Executive Director of the Atlanta-based Georgia Association of Latino Elected Officials joined marchers outside CNN Center carrying signs calling CNN’s Lou Dobbs a “racist”.

Dobb’s offense? His must – see daily television presentation of the consequences of illegal immigration.

Beware: The machine created by the open borders/illegal alien lobby designed to create a climate of fear for Americans who may be tempted to speak out in defense of their sovereign nation and against amnesty-again will be in high gear in 2007.

On illegal immigration, the president has found new friends.

Happy New Year… or as we may be saying next year if illegal aliens are awarded with a path to citizenship again… Feliz Año Nuevo.

D.A. King is president of the Dustin Inman Society, a Marietta-based non-profit coalition actively opposed to illegal immigration. On the Web: www.TheDustinInmanSociety.org

Illegal aliens murder twelve Americans a day…Congressman Steve King

DO NOT READ THIS NEWS ARTICLE!

Illegal aliens murder
12 Americans daily
Death toll in 2006 far overshadows total
U.S. soldiers killed in Iraq, Afghanistan

Though no federal statistics are kept on murders or any other crimes committed by illegal aliens, a number of groups have produced estimates based on data collected from prisons, news reports and independent research.

Twelve Americans are murdered every day by illegal aliens, according to statistics released by Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa. If those numbers are correct, it translates to 4,380 Americans murdered annually by illegal aliens. That’s 21,900 since Sept. 11, 2001.

Do not read the rest here.

The below column was written for and originally posted [ January 2, 2007 ] on Dick Pettys’ Insider Advantage Georgia , a subscription Website. Reposted here with permission. I have added several hyperlinks to educate the reader.

MALDEF position on local enforcement of immigration laws on shaky ground in AJC

By D.A. King

In a December 29 guest column in the Atlanta Journal Constitution, acting Southeast regional counsel for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund [MALDEF], Isaiah D. Delemar, threatens costly legal action if Cherokee County does not abandon its recently passed ordinance aimed at preventing landlords there from renting to “unauthorized immigrants”.

He goes on to argue that the federal government has sole jurisdiction and authority on immigration law enforcement – in contradiction of facts included in a publication distributed by his own organization.

It appears that Delemar has “unremebered” the first paragraph of the Introduction in a MALDEF co-sponsored publication entitled State and Local Police Enforcement of Federal Immigration laws: A Tool Kit for Advocates : “In 2003 the administration overturned a Department of Justice legal opinion and stated that the police have the inherent authority to enforce all federal immigration laws…”

The warning comes in the fifty-three page March 2006 online “how to” publication aimed at instructing pro-illegal immigration activists on defeating any local efforts at enforcement of immigration laws.

Absent the concern of an opposing view or equal time in the AJC – which Chaired the lavish 2004 annual MALDEF fundraiser gala in Atlanta – Delemar was able to bypass some important facts.

Unmentioned in Delemar’s AJC column: Existing law makes it a felony to shelter, assist, employ, harbor, transport or encourage an illegal alien to remain in the United States. Penalties are increased for doing so for commercial profit [8USC, 1324].

Recognized by many to be one of the most aggressive proponents of illegal immigration and bilingualism in the nation, the far left MALDEF shamelessly presents itself as a “civil rights organization”. The constant and relentless talking point from Delemar & Co. is that nothing less than a repeat of the legalization and a path to citizenship of the “one time” amnesty of 1986 is the solution to the crisis on which it thrives.

The code for this amnesty-again is “Comprehensive Immigration Reform”.

Illegal immigration is a very lucrative enterprise. With net assets of nearly $12 million, funded in large part from tax deductible donations from the same corporations benefiting from the taxpayer subsidized black market labor and markets it enables, MALDEF does indeed have the financial ability and manpower to intimidate local governments into ignoring their inherent authority to enforce immigration laws.

What it lacks is a history of candor or consistency with the truth.

Using the tool that has consistently proven to be the most effective in its fight against the enforcement of American immigration laws MALDEF and Delemar have again conjured up the mindless concept that those laws – and their equal application – would involve “discrimination” and “racial profiling”.

One must note that Mexico does not suffer what MALDEF labels as an “anti-immigrant” debate – as it uses its military to secure its borders, enthusiastically enforces its immigration and employment laws and deports more people annually than does the United States…mostly Latinos from Central America.

Following one of the far too infrequent federal efforts at enforcement in Stillmore Georgia late last year, Delamar’s predecessor, Tisha Tallman, joined other local advocates for illegals – including soon – to – be former state Senator Sam Zamarripa and Mexican citizen Teodoro Maus – in leading self -announced illegals in an Atlanta “March for Dignity”… and a demand to an end for any further enforcement of American immigration laws.

Zamarripa sits on the Board of Directors of MALDEF; Maus is the former Atlanta Mexican Consul General.

For those who study illegal immigration, it is sadly comical to watch as what can only be labeled as the open borders lobby instructs its advocates on how to circumvent and combat existing authority and law while being allowed to write misleading newspaper columns declaring that the authority it opposes does not exist.

Readers and observers of future MALDEF presentations would do well to keep in mind the true motivation, goals and methods of this well-paid gang of leftists, and to remember this: By definition, real immigrants do not require legalization or a path to citizenship.

They are on a path to citizenship and already proudly enjoy the rights and privileges of all who join the American family according to American laws.

King writes a column in the Marietta Daily Journal and is president of the non-profit Dustin Inman Society, a Marietta-based coalition dedicated to educating the Georgia public on the consequences of illegal immigration. www.TheDustinInmanSociety.org