Obama to American workers: Drop dead

By D.A. King, Macon Telegraph, January 3, 2010

Read the complete article

Summary:

The 2010 battle for repeating the "one-time" amnesty of 1986 has begun.

Last month, U.S. Rep. Luis Gutierrez, D-Ill, introduced legislation in the House to reward the hordes of illegal aliens who made it past our Border Patrol agents with legalization, jobs, public benefits and eventually the right to vote as citizens.

With the open borders lobby's usual shameless contempt for the intellect of the American people, Gutierrez is calling his bill "Comprehensive Immigration Reform for America's Security and Prosperity."

The 2010 battle for repeating the "one-time" amnesty of 1986 has begun.

Don't expect the legislation to receive nearly as much attention from the media as Tiger Woods' love life. The hope is that we are too busy to remember that President Obama promised to deliver amnesty as part of his "Hope and Change" election campaign — or to consider that nagging detail about America's raging unemployment crisis.

The contrived talking point is that legalizing the current batch of job thieves would result in a "boon to American workers" and somehow "strengthen our economy." I am not making this up.

America's unemployment rate dipped from 10.2 percent in October to 10 percent in November. Many economists put the actual unemployment rate at 17 percent. Using the most positive figures, about 16 million Americans are out of work.

Official statistics show a loss of 11,000 jobs last month. About 190,000 jobs were lost in October.

While monitoring CNN, I heard a reporter tell viewers that there are at least six applicants for each available job.

One pundit put it this way: "Unemployment isn't just worse than Obama said it would be with the stimulus. It's even worse than he said it would be without the stimulus."

In addition to his recent "jobs summit" designed to get ideas on how to cut unemployment, the American president has publicly promised to pursue "every additional and responsible step" to get America back to work. Except, apparently, to stem the flow of illegal immigration into the U.S. and to remove the black market replacement labor from the work force.

Obama could put about 8 million Americans in jobs next week if he would only enthusiastically enforce existing immigration and employment laws today. As a longtime American who studies the organized crime that is illegal immigration — which is directly related to American unemployment — let me share some facts that Gutierrez and Obama hope you will never see.

You are supposed to believe the fairy tale that American borders have been secured.

U.S. Border Patrol apprehended 556,040 new "undocumented workers" illegally crossing our borders in fiscal year 2009, which ended Sept. 30. Optimistic official estimates are one in four or five illegal alien border crossers are captured at the border.

Do the math.

Statistics from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement reveal significant drops in work site enforcement activity since last year. Administrative alien arrests (arrests of illegal aliens who will be placed into deportation proceedings) have dropped 68 percent.

Nationwide, criminal arrests are down 60 percent, criminal indictments have fallen 58 percent and criminal convictions are down 63 percent.

Obama has rescinded the Bush administration's common sense "No-Match Rule" in which the Social Security Administration sent letters to employers when employees' names and Social Security numbers fail to match.

So much change in only one year.

There will never be a time when another amnesty is the answer, including in these desperate times.

The amnesty of 1986 actually increased illegal immigration and illegal employment. It would have the same result today.

D.A. King is a nationally recognized authority on illegal immigration. He is president of the Georgia-based Dustin Inman Society. On the Web: (http://www.TheDustinInmanSociety.org.)

Read the complete article.

Fair Use: This site contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues related to mass immigration. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, see: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107----000-.html.
In order to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.