Immigration enforcement bills die under the Gold Dome

By D.A. King, Macon Telegraph, April 10, 2010

Read the complete article

Summary:

Let’s be crystal clear on this: The ACCG and GMA are directly and most responsible for the law being weak on enforcement tools

The Association County Commissioners of Georgia and the Georgia Municipal Authority are not exactly well-known names to the average Georgian. They should be.

They are two of the largest and most powerful lobbying groups in the Georgia Capitol. And they don’t seem to be on the same side of the illegal immigration/illegal employment fight as the citizen majority.

Including the ACLU, it would be difficult to find any organizations that are more effective in keeping meaningful punishments for violations out of the 2006 Georgia law aimed at illegal immigration.

Wait until you find out the source of their income. More on that farther down.

A brief look at their respective Web sites provides some insight into each group. ACCG: “The Association County Commissioners of Georgia is a nonprofit instrumentality of Georgia’s county governments ... .”

From the GMA Web site: “Our purpose is to anticipate and influence the forces shaping Georgia’s communities and to provide leadership, tools and services that assist local governments in becoming more innovative, effective and responsive ... .”

The defect is now brilliantly obvious in the Georgia Security and Immigration Compliance Act intended to insure that tax dollars are not spent to employ black market labor or give public benefits to illegal aliens: There is virtually no punishment for violating the law.

That is not an accident. Let’s be crystal clear on this: The ACCG and GMA are directly and most responsible for the law being weak on enforcement tools.

GSICA went into effect in 2007 and required that all local governments use the E-Verify system to be sure they were not paying illegal aliens with tax dollars and to use the federal SAVE system to verify the eligibility of applicants for public benefits.

Even now, there is not 100 percent compliance.

In the 2009 legislative session, House Bill 2 was written to amend the language of the original law so that it would have “teeth.” HB 2 was openly fought at every step of the long committee process by the ACLU, ACCG and GMA.

A much watered down version of HB 2 eventually passed, but still without any real punishment for violations, thanks to the dedicated and tireless “kill the bill” lobbying from ACCG and GMA.

Readers should know about two now dead 2010 bills that would have created substantial and effective sanctions for local governments and their contractors who are now treating the law as an option.

HB 1164 and the “Georgia Public Works and Contractor Protection Act” (Senate Bill 460) were written as fixes for “loopholes” in the 2006 law. They were gutted by ACCG/GMA and never allowed to go to a floor vote by House or Senate management.

I promised to let you know who is providing the funds to pay the salaries of the lobbyists at ACCG and GMA who work against enforcement of our state law that says we must obey federal immigration and employment and benefits laws.

Georgia citizens are the funders. Both groups are funded by dues paid by member counties and cities, both of which get the money from taxes paid by the usual victims in illegal immigration, the American taxpayer.

I am guessing not many readers were aware they are indirectly paying anti-enforcement lobbyist’s paychecks.

ACCG can be reached at 404 522-5022. GMA at 404 688-0472.

Silence is consent.

D.A. King is president of the Georgia-based Dustin Inman Society which is opposed to illegal immigration. On the Web: (http://www.TheDustinInmanSociety.org.)

Buzz up!

Read more: (http://www.macon.com/2010/04/11/1089295/immigration-enforcement-bills.html#none#ixzz0koCfzCwY)

Read the complete article.

Fair Use: This site contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues related to mass immigration. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, see: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107----000-.html.
In order to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.